2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpur.2013.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-time blow-up in the higher-dimensional parabolic–parabolic Keller–Segel system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
431
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 809 publications
(452 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
431
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Anyhow, a highly destabilizing potential of cross-diffusive terms of the type in (1.3), at relative strength increasing with the spatial dimension, is indicated by known results on the related classical Keller-Segel system of chemotaxis, as obtained by replacing the second equation in (1.3) with c t = ∆c − c + n: While all classical solutions to the corresponding initial-boundary value problem remain bounded when either N = 1, or N = 2 and the total mass Ω n 0 of cells is small ( [24], [23]), it is known that finite-time blow-up does occur for large classes of radially symmetric initial data when either N = 2 and Ω n 0 is large, or N ≥ 3 and Ω n 0 is an arbitrarily small prescribed number ( [22], [38]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anyhow, a highly destabilizing potential of cross-diffusive terms of the type in (1.3), at relative strength increasing with the spatial dimension, is indicated by known results on the related classical Keller-Segel system of chemotaxis, as obtained by replacing the second equation in (1.3) with c t = ∆c − c + n: While all classical solutions to the corresponding initial-boundary value problem remain bounded when either N = 1, or N = 2 and the total mass Ω n 0 of cells is small ( [24], [23]), it is known that finite-time blow-up does occur for large classes of radially symmetric initial data when either N = 2 and Ω n 0 is large, or N ≥ 3 and Ω n 0 is an arbitrarily small prescribed number ( [22], [38]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For γ 0 = 1, n = 3, Winkler [10], [11] prove that for any prescribed total mass of cells, there exist radially symmetric positive initial data such that the corresponding solution blows up in finite time. Dynamics and sensitivity of the solutions for a bacterial self-organization model is investigated in [4].…”
Section: Numerical Tests and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamics and sensitivity of the solutions for a bacterial self-organization model is investigated in [4]. Since the existence of cell kinetics term f (u, w) and without the assumption of radially symmetric in this paper, we can't construct effective energy function as done in [5], [11]. Our future research is to study the blow-up issue of the system (1.1).…”
Section: Numerical Tests and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1970s, a well-known chemotaxis model was proposed by Keller and Segel ([13]), which describes the aggregation processes of the cellular slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum. Since then, a number of variations of the Keller-Segel model have attracted the attention of many mathematicians, and the focused issue was the boundedness or blow-up of the solutions ( [5,7,9,10,39,20]). The striking feature of Keller-Segel models is the possibility of blow-up of solutions in a finite (or infinite) time (see, e.g., [1,9,18,39]), which strongly depends on the space dimension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, a number of variations of the Keller-Segel model have attracted the attention of many mathematicians, and the focused issue was the boundedness or blow-up of the solutions ( [5,7,9,10,39,20]). The striking feature of Keller-Segel models is the possibility of blow-up of solutions in a finite (or infinite) time (see, e.g., [1,9,18,39]), which strongly depends on the space dimension. Moreover, some recent studies have shown that the blow-up of solutions can be inhibited by the nonlinear diffusion (see Ishida et al [11] Winkler et al [1,27,36,40]) and the (generalized) logistic damping (see Li and Xiang [14], Tello and Winkler [31], Wang et al [33], Zheng et al [48]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%