1984
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(84)91881-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finiteness in rigid supersymmetric theories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
190
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
190
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(12). Note that we have not shown that the sum rule (10) is the unique solution for [β (2) m 2 ] j i .…”
Section: Two-loop Finite Ssb Termsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…(12). Note that we have not shown that the sum rule (10) is the unique solution for [β (2) m 2 ] j i .…”
Section: Two-loop Finite Ssb Termsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The quantity γ (1) λ is the one-loop contribution to the anomalous dimension of O from the single-trace interactions. The double-trace interaction also contributes to the renormalization of O, so that the full result for its one-loop anomalous dimension is…”
Section: Double-trace Renormalization To All Ordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While perturbatively finite supersymmetric QFTs have been known for a long time [1] and a vast zoo of non-perturbative supersymmetric examples was discovered during the duality revolution of the 1990s, only few non-supersymmetric, interacting CFTs in d = 4 are presently known. 1 The AdS/CFT correspondence [3][4][5] seems to offer an easy route to several more examples. A well-known construction [6,7] starts by placing a stack of N D3 branes at an orbifold singularity R 6 /Γ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the function .7) is unknown beyond the twoloop order in perturbation theory [9]. One approach, followed in [27], is to work to the leading order in perturbation theory in deformations, in which case γ is known.…”
Section: Jhep02(2006)040mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then we expect corrections on the right hand side of (4.8) suppressed by powers of g or h. One can in principle solve the corrected constraint in terms of h order by order in g and substitute this solution for h into the bare superpotential (4.3). This would amount to fine-tuning the bare deformation order by order in g. It is this fine-tuned theory which has to be conformally invariant [9]. This fine-tuning is designed to force the anomalous dimensions and the beta-function vanish (thus removing UV-divergencies from planar amplitudes) via cancellations between diagrams with different numbers of loops.…”
Section: Jhep02(2006)040mentioning
confidence: 99%