2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2008.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fire detection based on vision sensor and support vector machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
164
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 317 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
164
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Interesting approaches related to fire motion analysis on video are not applicable for static images (Chunyu et al, 2010), and most of these approaches where found not to work with satisfactory performance (Celik et al, 2007;Ko et al, 2009;Liu and Ahuja, 2004).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interesting approaches related to fire motion analysis on video are not applicable for static images (Chunyu et al, 2010), and most of these approaches where found not to work with satisfactory performance (Celik et al, 2007;Ko et al, 2009;Liu and Ahuja, 2004).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, [6][7][8][9][10] information from each pixel in the image was used to determine whether fires exist in the images. Alternatively, our paper proposes a method to model the local characteristics of fire, represented in sequential images based on patches of an input image, and to detect a fire area by using a supervised learning algorithm.…”
Section: Fire Detection Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Z. Teng 9 modeled the sequentially changing image pixel values by a hidden Markov model framework. Ko et al 10 applied a radial basis function kernel to two-class support vector machines. This research that uses machine learning algorithms could have an over-fitting problem and are not suitable for various environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To lower the false alarm rate, potential fire regions can be discarded when they do not comply with an expected deformation model [3,6,[8][9][10]. Checking the dynamic characteristics of the potential fire's outline is also good practice for the reduction of false positives [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%