2020
DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2019.1700184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Firefly Algorithm with non-homogeneous population: A case study in economic load dispatch problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of statistical comparisons between CO and different meta-heuristic and improved algorithms in recent studies are summarized in Table 9 . The competitive modified and hybrid algorithms in these two cases are: bacterial foraging optimization (BFO) 76 , a modified ion motion optimization (MIMO) conglomerated with crisscross search (CSO) named C-MIMO-CSO 77 , TLBO 78 , an improved orthogonal design particle swarm optimization (IODPSO) algorithm 79 , synergic predator–prey optimization (SPPO) algorithm 80 , multi-strategy ensemble biogeography-based optimization (MsEBBO) 81 , a new variant for the firefly algorithm, considering a non-homogeneous population named NhFA-Rnp 82 , clustering cuckoo search optimization (CCSO) 83 , a novel variant of competitive swarm optimizer (CSO) referred to as OLCSO 84 , and adaptive charged system search (ACSS) 85 . The results demonstrate that the algorithm outperforms other state-of-the-art and improved algorithms in terms of worst, mean, best, and standard deviation values.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of statistical comparisons between CO and different meta-heuristic and improved algorithms in recent studies are summarized in Table 9 . The competitive modified and hybrid algorithms in these two cases are: bacterial foraging optimization (BFO) 76 , a modified ion motion optimization (MIMO) conglomerated with crisscross search (CSO) named C-MIMO-CSO 77 , TLBO 78 , an improved orthogonal design particle swarm optimization (IODPSO) algorithm 79 , synergic predator–prey optimization (SPPO) algorithm 80 , multi-strategy ensemble biogeography-based optimization (MsEBBO) 81 , a new variant for the firefly algorithm, considering a non-homogeneous population named NhFA-Rnp 82 , clustering cuckoo search optimization (CCSO) 83 , a novel variant of competitive swarm optimizer (CSO) referred to as OLCSO 84 , and adaptive charged system search (ACSS) 85 . The results demonstrate that the algorithm outperforms other state-of-the-art and improved algorithms in terms of worst, mean, best, and standard deviation values.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation experiments implied superiority of the proposed ISPSO over other models used in the evaluation experiments. Another approach to solve an ELD problem in [21], is the proposing of a new variation of the firefly optimization algorithm with non-homogeneous population. An increase in the population from 4 to 4 × n and two population initialization techniques were used.…”
Section: Previous Methods Of Eldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test findings for the suggested approach showed high convergence features and low generation costs, making them extremely effective and encouraging. [42] ELD problems were solved with the FA. A 15-unit ELD problem with many considerations for each generator was solved using ten benchmark functions, and a 13-unit non-convex system with a valve-point loading effect was solved.…”
Section: Yearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, many optimization algorithms, such as the white shark optimizer [10], the search and rescue optimization algorithm (SAR) [11], the greedy sine-cosine nonhierarchical gray wolf optimizer (G-SCNHGWO) [12], the efficient chameleon swarm algorithm (CSA) [13], the memetic sine cosine algorithm [14], the hybrid Harris hawks optimizer (HHO) [15], the oppositional pigeon-inspired optimizer (OPIO) algorithm [16], the modified krill herd algorithm [17], the modified differential evolution algorithm [18], artificial eco system-based optimization [19], turbulent flow of water optimization (TFWO) [20], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [21], evolution strategy (ES) [22], teaching learning based optimization (TLBO) [23], the modified symbiotic organisms search algorithm (MSOS) [24], civilized swarm optimization (CSO) [25], the ant lion optimization algorithm (ALO) [26], the efficient distributed auction optimization algorithm (DAOA) [27], the hybrid grey wolf optimizer (HGWO) [28], the improved genetic algorithm (IGA) [29], the improved firefly algorithm (IFA) [30], biogeography-based optimization (BBO) [31], the heat transfer search (HTS) algorithm [32], adaptive charged system search (ACSS) [33], the evolutionary simplex adaptive Hooke-Jeeves algorithm (ESAHJ) [34], the enhanced moth-flame optimizer (EMFO) [35], multi-strategy ensemble biogeography-based optimization (MSEBBO) [36], several new hybrid algorithms [37], a fully decentralized approach (DA) [38], the exchange market algorithm (EMA) [39], bacterial foraging optimization (BFO) [40], the artificial cooperative search algorithm (ACS) [41], a new firefly algorithm (FA) via a non-homogeneous population [42]<...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%