2020
DOI: 10.1257/pandp.20201004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Firm-Level Automation: Evidence from the Netherlands

Abstract: Studying firm-level adjustments is important for understanding the economic effects of workplace automation. So far, emerging firm-level evidence is focused on robotics and the manufacturing sector. In this paper, we document that the adoption of automation technologies extends beyond manufacturing firms. We identify firm-level automation events and show that automating firms experience faster employment and revenue growth than do nonautomating firms. However, around automation events themselves, employment gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
51
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in that study the firms are not linked to individual workers. Finally, Bessen et al (2020) provide firm level evidence on automation from the Netherlands in the period 2000-2016. Using an event study design, they find that firms save labour after investing in automation technology, while wages rise.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in that study the firms are not linked to individual workers. Finally, Bessen et al (2020) provide firm level evidence on automation from the Netherlands in the period 2000-2016. Using an event study design, they find that firms save labour after investing in automation technology, while wages rise.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent papers byHumlum (2019), Acemoglu et.al. (2020,Bessen et al (2020) andDixon et al (2019) are discussed in the literature section below. 2 See Lachowska et al (2020),Engbom and Moser (2020) andBarth et al (2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To start, it is the second European country, after Germany, for robot use (Dottori, 2020). Second, from a methodological perspective, we can take advantage of the 2013 Italian National Institute for Public Policies Analysis (Inapp) Survey of Professions (Indagine Campionaria sulle Professioni, Inapp ICP hereafter), that represents the Italian equivalent of the American O*NET and provides information on the generalised tasks and the specific activities and duties of over 800 five-digit level occupations in Italy by combining survey-based worker-level information and post-survey validation by experts' focus 2 Other microeconomic studies find negative effects on firm employment once the spurious positive correlation induced by demand effects is netted out (Bessen et al, 2020;Bonfiglioli et al, 2020), while Acemoglu et al (2020a) obtain contrasting results between adopters and non-adopters but with prevailing negative effects due to the latter set of firms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the paper relates to theoretical and empirical works on the relationship between automation and labour (for a review, see Barbieri et al, 2020). The rapid diffusion of AI and robots has led many authors to investigate the effects of these technologies on labour, comparing different dimensions such as employment Restrepo, 2020, 2019a;Bessen et al, 2019Bessen et al, , 2020Graetz and Michaels, 2018b;Carbonero et al, 2020;Chiacchio et al, 2018;Dauth et al, 2017), skill polarization (Acemoglu and Restrepo, 2018) and wage inequality (Barth et al, 2020). Rather than focusing on the consequences of automation technologies, we study whether labour market institutions such workplace ER affect their adoption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%