2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Firm-specific Determinants of Agricultural Financial Reporting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
38
2
29

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
11
38
2
29
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4.3 shows that ownership structure is likely to have some impact on IFRS adoption. The finding is consistent with a previous study which found that ownership structure influences companies' decisions to adopt IAS 41 (Gonç alves & Lopes, 2014) The audit type (AUD_TYP) coefficient is positive and significant at the 1 percent level, meaning that companies using international audit firms in Nigeria such as Deloitte, Ernst and Young, KPMG and PricewaterhouseCoopers have a greater probability of IFRS adoption than companies that used local audit firms. The significance of audit firms on IFRS adoption confirms Souza et al (2015) report on the impact of Big 4 audit firms on IFRS adoption.…”
Section: Optimism Versus Conservatism Dimensionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Table 4.3 shows that ownership structure is likely to have some impact on IFRS adoption. The finding is consistent with a previous study which found that ownership structure influences companies' decisions to adopt IAS 41 (Gonç alves & Lopes, 2014) The audit type (AUD_TYP) coefficient is positive and significant at the 1 percent level, meaning that companies using international audit firms in Nigeria such as Deloitte, Ernst and Young, KPMG and PricewaterhouseCoopers have a greater probability of IFRS adoption than companies that used local audit firms. The significance of audit firms on IFRS adoption confirms Souza et al (2015) report on the impact of Big 4 audit firms on IFRS adoption.…”
Section: Optimism Versus Conservatism Dimensionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Assim, empresas com valores relevantes investidos em Ativos biológicos tendem a trazer mais informações aos Stakeholders. Resultado semelhante foi encontrado em pesquisas nacionais (Scherer et al, 2014;Scherch et al, 2013;Pires et al, 2016;Moura et al, 2016) e internacionais (Gonçalves & Lopes, 2014).…”
Section: Discussão Dos Resultadosunclassified
“…Internacionalmente também a pesquisa de Gonçalves e Lopes (2014) O Tamanho da empresa também pode ser um fator que influencie positivamente na divulgação, pois empresas maiores tendem a ter um efeito relevante sobre a comunidade, stakeholders e, por conseguinte, maiores custos políticos devido sua visibilidade, atraindo assim maior atenção do governo e mercado como um todo (Rover, Tomazzia, Murcia, & Borba, 2012). Pesquisas anteriores também encontraram esses efeitos para Disclosure dos ativos biológicos no país (Scherer et al, 2014;Macedo et al, 2015) e no exterior (Gonçalves & Lopes, 2014). Com isso, a Hipótese 2 é H2: Existe uma relação positiva entre Tamanho e o Nível Disclosure do CPC 29.…”
Section: Hipóteses Da Pesquisaunclassified
“…Berdasarkan penelitian yang dilakukan dengan sampel 181 perusahaan di dari beberapa negara dan sektor yang berbeda, namun 7 di antaranya tidak memiliki laporan tahunan 2011 yang tersedia, sehingga jumlah efektif perusahaan yang dianalisis adalah 174. Penelitian ini menjabarkan mengenai kepatuhan pengungkapan IAS 41 serta mengeksplorasi beberapa faktor yang mempengaruhi perbedaan tingkat kepatuhan pengungkapan IAS 41 di perusahaan dengan variabel yakni intensitas aset biologis, kepemilikan konsentrasi, ukuran, jenis auditor dan pemangku kepentingan internasional (Gonçalves & Lopes, 2014). Hasil yang diperoleh dari penelitian ini adalah Intensitas dan ukuran perusahaan memiliki dampak positif yang signifikan terhadap praktik pengungkapan wajib yang didukung oleh pemangku kepentingan dan teori agensi.…”
Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasanunclassified
“…Hasil yang diperoleh dari penelitian ini adalah Intensitas dan ukuran perusahaan memiliki dampak positif yang signifikan terhadap praktik pengungkapan wajib yang didukung oleh pemangku kepentingan dan teori agensi. Perusahaan dengan difusi kepemilikan yang lebih tinggi memiliki insentif yang lebih kuat untuk memberikan transparansi pelaporan keuangan (Oliveira, Rodrigues, & Craig, 2006;Gonçalves & Lopes, 2014).…”
Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasanunclassified