1992
DOI: 10.21273/jashs.117.4.590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Firmness Measurement of Stored `Delicious' Apples by Sensory Methods, Magness-Taylor, and Sonic Transmission

Abstract: Delicious' apples (Malus domestica Borkh.) from five major U.S. production areas were tested after ≈3 ≈3 months of commercial storage. Soluble solids concentration (SSC), titratable acidity (TA), Magness-Taylor (MT) firmness, and sonic transmission spectra were compared with ripeness (maturity in trade terminology) scores assigned by six U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (USDA)-licensed apple inspectors according to USDA Grades and Standards inspection procedures. USDA ripeness categories are defined by textural and f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The acoustic firmness was measured using a commercial acoustic firmness tester (AFS, Aweta, Nootdorp, The Netherlands). The stiffness index (S = f 2 m 2/3 ) was calculated based on the resonant frequency (f) of the first peak frequency and the mass (m) of the fruit (Abbott et al, 1992), and was equal to 30.3 and 32.1 Hz 2 kg 2/3 for Jonagored and Braeburn, respectively. After one month at 0.8 and 1°C for Jonagored and Braeburn, respectively, and 65% RH for both cultivars, half of the apples were taken directly from the cool room for the experiment performance (''control"); the other half were stored for an additional period of 12 days under simulated shelf-life conditions (21°C and 65% RH; ''shelf-life") and had after storage an average stiffness index of 23.3 and 22.1 Hz 2 kg 2/3 for Jonagored and Braeburn, respectively.…”
Section: Cultivars and Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acoustic firmness was measured using a commercial acoustic firmness tester (AFS, Aweta, Nootdorp, The Netherlands). The stiffness index (S = f 2 m 2/3 ) was calculated based on the resonant frequency (f) of the first peak frequency and the mass (m) of the fruit (Abbott et al, 1992), and was equal to 30.3 and 32.1 Hz 2 kg 2/3 for Jonagored and Braeburn, respectively. After one month at 0.8 and 1°C for Jonagored and Braeburn, respectively, and 65% RH for both cultivars, half of the apples were taken directly from the cool room for the experiment performance (''control"); the other half were stored for an additional period of 12 days under simulated shelf-life conditions (21°C and 65% RH; ''shelf-life") and had after storage an average stiffness index of 23.3 and 22.1 Hz 2 kg 2/3 for Jonagored and Braeburn, respectively.…”
Section: Cultivars and Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this study, however, show that this mode class may be as important as the torsional and spheroidal mode classes in firmness measurements. For instance, in the experimental setup of Finney (1970) and Abbott et al (1992), the apple is likely to vibrate in the first nonaxisymmetric (or bending) mode, and this mode could be as easily detected as the first spheroidal mode in the instrument setup. Further understanding of the actual dynamic behavior of the apple will require incorporation of actual instrumentation configurations, load inputs, and damping effects into the models and comparison with experimental measurements of actual vibrational modes in apples.…”
Section: Effects Of Shape and Size On Vibrational Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore a more comprehensive, nondestructive, remote method for product texture evaluation would have distinct advantages for quality control. Shmulevich et al (1996) compiled a list of the promising methods for nondestructive fruit texture analysis: 1) fruit responses to imposed vibrations (Abbott et al, 1992;Finney, 1967), 2) the response of fruit to mechanical or sonic impulse (Yamamoto and Haginuma, 1984a, 1984b, 1984c, 3) impact force analysis (Armstrong et al, 1990;Chen et al, 1993), and 4) ultrasonic testing techniques (Galili et al, 1993;Mizrach et al, 1989;Zebrowski, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%