Over the last decade interest in automated assays for 25-hydroxy-vitamin D measurement have greatly increased. The presence of different metabolites of vitamin D in the blood influences measurement of its concentration. In paediatric subjects the basic interference is due to the presence of 3-epi-25(OH)D 2 /D 3 , which despite their biological inactivity, influences the total concentration of 25(OH)D. Aim: We assessed the analytical performance and usefulness of two different assays for measurement of total 25(OH)D in children. Materials and Methods: The study was performed in blood samples taken from 100 school-children aged 9-11 years. In all serum samples 25(OH)D total concentration was measured with the use of chemiluminescent assay, which is known to show no cross-reactivity with 3-epi-25(OH)D, and with the use of a newly developed enzyme-immunosorbent method. Results: The mean 25(OH)D concentration in children measured with enzyme-immunosorbent assay (EIA) was significantly higher, at 28.06 ng/mL, than with the chemiluminescent assay (CLIA), at 21.13 ng/mL; < 0.0001. In children with optimal weight the average 25(OH)D was 32.93 ng/ml (EIA) and 21.5 ng/mL (CLIA) (p < 0.0001), respectively, whereas in a subgroup with overweight/obesity the mean concentration of 25(OH)D was similar, at 23.2 ng/ml (EIA) and 20.76 ng/ml (CLIA) (p = 0.15). The nonparametric Spearman's rank correlation of two methods equalled 0.47; 95%CI (0.11 to 0.60) with a significance level p < 0.0001. The calculated concordance correlation coefficient between two methods in the whole group was 0.26; 95%CI (0.17 to 0.35). In a subgroup of children with optimal body mass (N = 50) the concordance correlation coefficient was 0.18; 95%CI (0.06 to 0.29), whereas in children with overweight/obesity (N = 50) it was 0.44; 95%CI (0.29 to 057). Mean bias for the enzyme-immunosorbent method equalled 18.7%; +/-1.96 SD (101.3% to-64%). Conclusions: With reference to 25(OH)D measurement in children, Spearman's correlation coefficient indicated "moderate correlation" between the two compared methods, whereas the strength of agreement (concordance) between both methods was characterised as "poor". The proper selection of assay for accurate assessment of vitamin D status in paediatric samples is necessary to avoid misdiagnosis.