2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First announcements and real economic activity

Abstract: The recent literature suggests that …rst announcements of real output growth in the US have predictive power for the future course of the economy. We show that this need not point to a behavioural relationship, whereby agents respond to the announcement, but may instead simply be a by-product of the data revision process. Initial estimates are subsequently subject to a number of rounds of revisions: the nature of these revisions is shown to be key in determining any apparent relationship between …rst announcem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An early contribution was Oh and Waldman (1990), who considered the macroeconomic e¤ects of 'false' announcements (see also Oh and Waldman (2005)), and argued that an upbeat estimate of the current state of the economy which was subsequently revised down would lead to stronger output growth than would otherwise have transpired (with the reverse being true of an ex post pessimistic assessment). Rodriguez-Mora and Schulstad (2007) …nd that …rst announcements of GDP growth are a more important determinant of subsequent actual GDP growth than the true value of GDP growth in the earlier period (see also Clements and Galvão (2010)). The importance of expectational errors for business cycle ‡uctuations has a long history, as indicated in the cited papers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An early contribution was Oh and Waldman (1990), who considered the macroeconomic e¤ects of 'false' announcements (see also Oh and Waldman (2005)), and argued that an upbeat estimate of the current state of the economy which was subsequently revised down would lead to stronger output growth than would otherwise have transpired (with the reverse being true of an ex post pessimistic assessment). Rodriguez-Mora and Schulstad (2007) …nd that …rst announcements of GDP growth are a more important determinant of subsequent actual GDP growth than the true value of GDP growth in the earlier period (see also Clements and Galvão (2010)). The importance of expectational errors for business cycle ‡uctuations has a long history, as indicated in the cited papers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two strands of the economic literature investigate these revisions and their statistical properties. The first strand investigates whether GDP revisions are news or noise (Mankiw et al, 1984;Mankiw and Shapiro, 1986) and whether they are rational and predictable (Aruoba, 2008;Clements and Galvão, 2010;Faust et al, 2005;Rodríguez Mora and Schulstad, 2007;Sinclair and Stekler, 2013). A second strand focuses on the state-dependence of GDP revisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that information dispersion (not only information imperfection) is critical here. If all agents shared the same information, no matter how imprecise, then they would get to know aggregate endogenous variables (such as output) by a simple symmetry argument, which would negate the econometrician's informational advantage or, at best, reduce it to one period 7 . When information is not the same across agents, though, agents will correctly not presume that other agents' decisions will be the same as theirs, hence they will remain uncertain about the aggregate level of the endogenous variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clements and Galvão (2010) entertain both the definition of final release as the latest available or that occurring a fixed number of quarters after the end of the period of interest (in their case 14 quarters, seeming to favor the latter because it is less affected by long-term revisions. On the other hand, Rodriguez-Mora and Schulstad (2007) seem to favor our approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%