2012
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3481.1.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First description of the male spider Pacifiphantes magnificus (Chamberlin & Ivie) (Araneae: Linyphiidae)

Abstract: The spider Pacifiphantes magnificus (Chamberlin & Ivie 1943)(Linyphiidae), originally described as a member of the ge-nus Bathyphates, is redescribed and the first description of the male is presented. DNA barcoding was used to test the conspecificity of specimens from different collection events and to help match specimens from different sexes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10). It also has been previously pointed out that Pacifiphantes magnificus (Chamberlin & Ivie, 1943) could be a misplacement, and probably grouped with Porrhomma + Diplostyla as indicated by both morphology and DNA barcoding (Slowik and Blagoev 2012). As the type species, Pacifiphantes zakharovi was identified with a super short embolus (Eskov and Marusik 1994: fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10). It also has been previously pointed out that Pacifiphantes magnificus (Chamberlin & Ivie, 1943) could be a misplacement, and probably grouped with Porrhomma + Diplostyla as indicated by both morphology and DNA barcoding (Slowik and Blagoev 2012). As the type species, Pacifiphantes zakharovi was identified with a super short embolus (Eskov and Marusik 1994: fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…102); Microbathyphantes Helsdingen, 1985 has coiled, whip-like, and fully exposed embolus (Tu and Li 2006: fig. 2C), unlike the one enveloped in a membranous plate of the convector in Callosa gen. n. The epigyne in Callosa gen. n. is distinguished by its long, spiraling copulatory furrows and the presence of a septum (Figs 3C, 7C); the receptacles are situated farther from atrium in most Bathyphantes species, furrows are not in double-helix; Kaestneria Wiehle, 1956 and Pacifiphantes have shorter copulatory furrows, which fold or curve (Slowik and Blagoev 2012: fig. 6); the copulatory furrows in Microbathyphantes make only half a turn.…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a rule, adult spiders in our dataset were identified to the species level based on morphology, but all representatives of certain small-bodied spider families (mainly Linyphiidae and Theridiidae) were barcoded because of the difficulty in species discrimination through morphology. Most juveniles and some females were assigned to a species based on their sequence similarity (<2%) to specimens of the taxon that were identified through morphological study [ 26 - 28 ]. Barcode clusters that were distinct from all others (>2% divergence), but that contained only juveniles, could not be identified morphologically and were thus assigned interim species codes and treated as separate species for analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, DNA barcoding generally improves the identification reliability for species that can only be identified by one sex or life stage, and enables identification of damaged specimens, and can therefore help detect range shifts that might otherwise go undetected (e.g. Chown et al 2009, Hendrich et al 2010, Slowik and Blagoev 2012. It can also be employed for the identification of taxa which lack sufficient taxonomists to meet identification requests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%