2015
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First direct evidence of a Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO): a large thrombus straddling the foramen ovale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some strokes of unknown origin may be caused by paradoxical embolism due to PFO (1). Although observing a thrombus straddling the PFO is difficult, some cases are detected by echocardiography (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11). In the present case, we considered there to be a high possibility of tumor embolism rather than thromboembolism, including Trousseau syndrome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Some strokes of unknown origin may be caused by paradoxical embolism due to PFO (1). Although observing a thrombus straddling the PFO is difficult, some cases are detected by echocardiography (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11). In the present case, we considered there to be a high possibility of tumor embolism rather than thromboembolism, including Trousseau syndrome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The occasional opening of the PFO results in an abnormal right-to-left shunt (RLS). A thrombus and tumor straddling the PFO provide direct evidence that the RLS-related paradoxical embolism is correlated with cryptogenic stroke, migraine, and some of other symptoms ( 2 , 3 ). Given the increasingly understanding of PFO closure for stroke prevention, current guidelines recommend PFO screenings for stroke patients as necessary ( 4 , 5 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The higher prevalence of PFO in CS of all ages (3, 4) suggests a pathogenic role for PFO, at least in a substantial portion of these patients. Assuming that paradoxical embolism is the predominant pathogenic mechanism for recurrent strokes (5), PFO closure is a logical treatment option. However, recent RCTs comparing percutaneous closure with antithrombotic treatment revealed inconsistent results-some of them in favor of closure (6)(7)(8)(9), whereas others without a significant advantage of closure (10)(11)(12)(13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%