2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00334-017-0622-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First finds of Prunus domestica L. in Italy from the Phoenician and Punic periods (6th–2nd centuries bc)

Abstract: scanner and analysed by applying image analysis techniques to measure 26 morphometric features. By applying stepwise linear discriminant analysis, a morphometric comparison was made between the archaeological fruitstones of Prunus and the modern ones collected in Sardinia. These analyses allowed identification of 53 archaeological fruitstones as P. spinosa and 11 as P. domestica. Moreover, the archaeological samples of P. spinosa showed morphometric similarities in 92.5% of the cases with the modern P. spinosa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It constitutes a main crop predominating in Europe as well as southwest Asia. [ 5 ] Its dried fruits, the prunes, have recently been recognized as a beneficial food item with various health‐improving properties, such as alleviating leucorrhoea and adjusting irregular menstrual cycle or as a laxative. Besides, it showed a powerful antioxidant activity due to its high content of many polyphenolics as caffeoylquinic acid different isomers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It constitutes a main crop predominating in Europe as well as southwest Asia. [ 5 ] Its dried fruits, the prunes, have recently been recognized as a beneficial food item with various health‐improving properties, such as alleviating leucorrhoea and adjusting irregular menstrual cycle or as a laxative. Besides, it showed a powerful antioxidant activity due to its high content of many polyphenolics as caffeoylquinic acid different isomers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All specimens in the UCL archaeobotanical reference collection; scale bars 1 cm that wild and domesticated populations fall towards different ends of a morphological spectrum seems clear. Indeed, studies employing geometric morphometrics (GMM) on grapes (Vitis vinifera) (Pagnoux et al 2015;Bacilieri et al 2017), as well as on other taxa such as olives (Olea europaea) (Terral et al 2004;Newton et al 2014), plums (Prunus domestica) (Ucchesu et al 2017) and dates (Phoenix dactylifera) (Rivera et al 2014;Gros-Balthazard et al 2016), which factor out size and focus instead on shape, demonstrate statistically shape differences between wild and cultivated forms of these fruits, as well as among different cultivar groups. Domesticated forms have higher L:W ratios and tend to have more pointed (acute to acuminate) ends.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have likewise attempted to distinguish wild and cultivated fruit species, as well as their different varieties, through morphometric and DNA analyses [24,[142][143][144][145][146][147]. The findings of the morphometric approach to 6th century BC grape pips from the south of France, for example, suggest cultivation [129,148].…”
Section: What Is New?mentioning
confidence: 99%