1) Background: BET bromodomain proteins regulate transcription by binding acetylated 8 histones and attracting key factors for e.g. transcriptional elongation. BET inhibitors have been 9 developed to block pathogenic processes such as cancer and inflammation. Despite having potent 10 biological activities, BET inhibitors have still not made a breakthrough in clinical use for treating 11 cancer. Multiple resistance mechanisms have been proposed but thus far no attempts to block this 12 in glioma has been made. (2) Methods: Here, we have conducted a pharmacological synergy screen 13 in glioma cells to search for possible combination treatments augmenting the apoptotic response to 14 BET inhibitors. We first used HMBA, a compound that was developed as a differentiation therapy 15 four decades ago but more recently was shown to primarily inhibit BET bromodomain proteins.
16Data was also generated using other BET inhibitors. (3) Results: In the synergy screen, we 17 discovered that several MEK inhibitors can enhance apoptosis in response to HMBA in rat and 18 human glioma cells in vitro as well as in vivo xenografts. The combination is not unique to HMBA 19 but also other BET inhibitors such as JQ1 and I-BET-762 can synergize with MEK inhibitors. (4) 20 Conclusions: Our findings validate a combination therapy previously demonstrated to exhibit anti-21 cancer activities in multiple other tumor types but which appears to have been lost in translation to 22 the clinic.23 Keywords: BET bromodomain protein, hexamethylene bisacetamide, glioma 24 25 1. Introduction 26 Before the discovery of oncogenes the concept of cancer cell differentiation therapy was explored 27 therapeutically, in part based on early observations that dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) can cause 28 differentiation of Friend virus induced mouse erythroleukemia (MEL) cells into hemoglobin 29producing red blood cells (1). Efforts to produce more potent cancer differentiation compounds 30 generated two molecules that were tested in the clinic, hexamethylene bisacetamide (HMBA) and 31 suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA, later renamed to vorinostat) (2, 3). Whereas SAHA was 32 found to inhibit histone deacetylases (HDACs) 1-3 and made it to clinical approval for cutaneous T-33 cell leukemia, HMBA neither inhibits HDACs nor received clinical approval, and its target was 34 unknown for forty years (4, 5). Recently, however, we discovered that HMBA is a bromodomain and 35 extra-terminal domain (BET) inhibitor, with highest binding affinity for bromodomain 2 (BD2) of BET 36 proteins BRD2, BRD3 and BRD4 while also inhibiting the bromodomain of histone acetyltransferase 37 P300 (6). The structure of HMBA largely resembles that of an acetylated lysine, explaining the mode 38 of action.
40Although HMBA was likely the first anti-cancer compound used in the clinic that inhibited BET 41 bromodomain proteins, the concept of BET inhibitors (BETis) were largely popularized with the 42 development of the low nanomolar BETis JQ1 and iBET-151 (7, 8). The mechanism of action of thes...