2012
DOI: 10.1021/jp301925k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-Principle Protocol for Calculating Ionization Energies and Redox Potentials of Solvated Molecules and Ions: Theory and Application to Aqueous Phenol and Phenolate

Abstract: The effect of hydration on the lowest vertical ionization energy (VIE) of phenol and phenolate solvated in bulk water was characterized using the equation-of-motion ionization potential coupled-cluster (EOM-IP-CCSD) and effective fragment potential (EFP) methods (referred to as EOM/EFP), and determined experimentally by valence photo-emission measurements using microjets and synchrotron radiation. The computed solvent-induced shifts in VIEs (ΔVIE) are −0.66 eV and +5.72 eV for phenol and phenolate, respectivel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

30
260
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

6
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(297 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
30
260
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect is accounted for by computing additive energy corrections to the excitation energies [310]. The combination of first-prinicple polarisable explict solvents with the EOM-CC family of methods is a unique feature of Q-CHEM, enabling state-of-the art calculations of solvatochromic effects and redox processes [312,313]. To sum up, the major differences between the QM/EFP and QM/MM schemes are: (1) more accurate and detailed description of the electrostatic interactions in EFP using distributed multipoles up to octopoles versus the partial charge representation used in typical MM; (2) polarisable environment in EFP induces self-consistent response to the electronic wave function of the quantum region, while most classical force fields are not polarisable.…”
Section: Qm/mm and Fragment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect is accounted for by computing additive energy corrections to the excitation energies [310]. The combination of first-prinicple polarisable explict solvents with the EOM-CC family of methods is a unique feature of Q-CHEM, enabling state-of-the art calculations of solvatochromic effects and redox processes [312,313]. To sum up, the major differences between the QM/EFP and QM/MM schemes are: (1) more accurate and detailed description of the electrostatic interactions in EFP using distributed multipoles up to octopoles versus the partial charge representation used in typical MM; (2) polarisable environment in EFP induces self-consistent response to the electronic wave function of the quantum region, while most classical force fields are not polarisable.…”
Section: Qm/mm and Fragment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the fact that p-MePhSH in ethanol has a lower VIP (7.2 eV) 41 than PhOH in water (7.9 eV) 30 shows that a lower VIP does not necessarily predicate a larger autoionization yield.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimentally, recent developments in liquid microjet techniques 15,16 enabled the measurement of photoelectrons emitted directly from the liquid solutions and constituted a fundamental step forward in understanding the electronic properties of aqueous solutions. From a theoretical standpoint, only few interpretations or predictions 15,[17][18][19][20] of photoelectron spectra appeared in the literature; indeed, the microscopic description of aqueous solutions from first principles remains a challenging task, both from a theoretical and computational standpoint, and especially so in the case of anions, whose electronic structure is in general more complex than that of cations. 7,21,22 In this paper, we consider a chloride anion in aqueous solution and report an analysis of its electronic properties based on first principles molecular dynamics (MD) using several levels of theory; these include semi-local (Perdew-BurkeErnzerhof (PBE) 23,24 ) and hybrid (PBE0 25 ) functionals and many body perturbation theory (MBPT) 26 within the G 0 W 0 approximation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%