2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.01.089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-principles calculations on Mg/Al4C3 interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the £-Fe(1-11) slabs, with spin-polarization, the calculated surface energies with 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 atom layers are 4.176, 2.966, 2.739, 2.715 and 2.742 J/m 2 respectively, which are close to the nonspin-polarized results shown in Table 1. In the case of Cr 2 N(0001)/£-Fe (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11) interface with N-terminated, the interface energies with spin-polarized are from 0.765 eV to 0.959 eV for the HCP stacking system, and from 0.714 eV to 0.872 eV for the OT stacking one, which have the similar linear trends with non-spin-polarized value shown in Fig. 3.…”
Section: Computational Methodologysupporting
confidence: 62%
“…For the £-Fe(1-11) slabs, with spin-polarization, the calculated surface energies with 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 atom layers are 4.176, 2.966, 2.739, 2.715 and 2.742 J/m 2 respectively, which are close to the nonspin-polarized results shown in Table 1. In the case of Cr 2 N(0001)/£-Fe (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11) interface with N-terminated, the interface energies with spin-polarized are from 0.765 eV to 0.959 eV for the HCP stacking system, and from 0.714 eV to 0.872 eV for the OT stacking one, which have the similar linear trends with non-spin-polarized value shown in Fig. 3.…”
Section: Computational Methodologysupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The interlayer spacing and binding energy are 3.6 Å and -9.69 meV/atom for A-A stacking, The calculation also shows that the graphene with the interlayer spacing of 3.2 Å and interfacial binding energy of -57.53 meV/atom. The binding energies are similar to previous investigations of 2D materials of MoS 2 [18], and less than those of CoO/MnO [19] and Mg/Al 4 C 3 [20] interfaces. This result indicates that the interlayer interaction is weak for NHG.…”
Section: Stacking Orders Of A-a A-b A-c A-d A-e A-f and A-g Csupporting
confidence: 88%
“…15,16 The heterogeneous nucleation potential depends on the surface atomic structures, surface energy of the nucleation substrate, and the interfacial properties between the substrate and matrix. 17,18 However, to our knowledge, research on the Al 4 Sr surface properties at the microscopic scale is not available till now. In the present work, we focus on the structure and properties of Al 4 Sr(001) surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%