2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2006.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-principles studies on initial growth of Ni on MgO(001) surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
11
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
11
11
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1(b), this result may be compared with previous results for bcc metals, Cr, Fe and V which indicate that the binding energy tends to increase with increasing cohesive energy. In addition, it is worth noting that E B for Nb is much larger than the value we have obtained for Ag (E B O = 0.43 eV) but is comparable to values previously obtained for Ni (E B O = 1.33 − 1.45 eV [19,33]) and Pt (1.50 eV [20]). Table 1, the significantly higher binding energy at an O-site compared to a Mg-site is not due to a difference in the amount of electronic charge transfer Δρ e mainly from below an O-site since in both cases it is negligibly small (0.03 e).…”
Section: Monomer Adsorption and Diffusion On Mgo(001)supporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1(b), this result may be compared with previous results for bcc metals, Cr, Fe and V which indicate that the binding energy tends to increase with increasing cohesive energy. In addition, it is worth noting that E B for Nb is much larger than the value we have obtained for Ag (E B O = 0.43 eV) but is comparable to values previously obtained for Ni (E B O = 1.33 − 1.45 eV [19,33]) and Pt (1.50 eV [20]). Table 1, the significantly higher binding energy at an O-site compared to a Mg-site is not due to a difference in the amount of electronic charge transfer Δρ e mainly from below an O-site since in both cases it is negligibly small (0.03 e).…”
Section: Monomer Adsorption and Diffusion On Mgo(001)supporting
confidence: 86%
“…2, the strong hybridization between the Nb s and d orbitals and the O p orbital leads to primarily covalent bonding. A similar hybridization has also been observed for Ni/MgO(001) at an O-site with a similarly large value of the binding energy [19].…”
Section: Monomer Adsorption and Diffusion On Mgo(001)supporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The peak at 0.8 eV is smaller than in metallic nickel indicating hybridization of Ni 3d orbitals because of bond formation with surface oxygen. Such sharp signals have also been predicted by theoretical calculations for the adsorption of small Ni clusters (1-5 atoms) on MgO(0 0 1) [31]. At binding energies between 4 and 8 eV which are representative for O 2p in oxide as well as for adsorbed oxygen (reference b) an intensity minimum is observed.…”
Section: Deconvolution Of Mies Reference Spectrasupporting
confidence: 69%