2018
DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.m2018014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-Principles Study of BCC/FCC Phase Transition Promoted by Interstitial Carbon in Iron

Abstract: We report the effect of carbon on the phase transition between body centered cubic (BCC) and face centered cubic (FCC) in iron along Bain pathway, taking into account magnetic configurations, using density functional theory in combination with the generalized solid-state nudged elastic band method. We found that, for pure iron system, the energy barrier of 13.22 kJ•mol ¹1 is needed for the BCC-to-FCC process happens, while 2.41 kJ•mol ¹1 is needed for the reverse process (FCC-to-BCC). In the presence of carbon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(27 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conclusion for Fe-C interaction is in good agreement with the findings from DFT calculations, showing the presence of C in BCC Fe forms local stress field and pushes the 1NN Fe atoms away to maintain the Fe-C equilibrium distance of 1.780 Å in ferromagnetic BCC. 14) For the C-C interaction, the result in this work is also consistent with the findings of Bhadeshia et al, 24) where it is stated that the closest approach distance of C atoms in BCC is 1.430 Å, corresponding to a highly repulsive energy. Finally, for C-V O and V Fe -C pairs, Fig.…”
Section: Atomic Pair Interaction Energysupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The conclusion for Fe-C interaction is in good agreement with the findings from DFT calculations, showing the presence of C in BCC Fe forms local stress field and pushes the 1NN Fe atoms away to maintain the Fe-C equilibrium distance of 1.780 Å in ferromagnetic BCC. 14) For the C-C interaction, the result in this work is also consistent with the findings of Bhadeshia et al, 24) where it is stated that the closest approach distance of C atoms in BCC is 1.430 Å, corresponding to a highly repulsive energy. Finally, for C-V O and V Fe -C pairs, Fig.…”
Section: Atomic Pair Interaction Energysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In BCC iron, it is well known that C atoms prefer to occupy the octahedral sites (O-sites) of BCC lattice. 14,15) For easy visualization, the structural model of Fe sites and O-sites in the BCC lattice are depicted in Fig. 1…”
Section: Cluster Expansion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All bonding states are found below the Fermi level (E F = 0 eV) and all antibonding states are found above the Fermi level, con rming covalent bonding characteristic between interstitial carbon and its neighboring Fe atoms. 38 Figure 5c compares the LDOS of interstitial carbon and Fe at the rst neighbor site with the total -pCOHP and orbital-resolved -pCOHP results between interstitial carbon and neighboring Fe atoms. We found the dominating bonding states around -12.5 eV to involve C 2s and Fe 4s orbitals (Figure 5c-iii) as expected from molecular orbital theory, 36,37 with a smaller contribution of C 2s -Fe 3d bonding (Figure 5c-iv), which is not observed in molecules.…”
Section: Effect Of Interstitial Carbon On Bond Strength Of An Alloy Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of very interesting magnetic properties, higher SPR and thermal stability, experimental reports on Fe 4 C are almost nonexistent and single-phase Fe 4 C has not yet been synthesized. Recently, interatomic potential for Fe-C systems were calculated using modified embedded atom method (MEAM) and it was predicted that the presence of C lowers the body center cubic (bcc) to face center cubic (fcc) transformation barrier [18,19]. Also the activation energy for C diffusion in Fe was calculated and found to be very small at about 0.8 eV [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%