“…As a prominent class of crystalline compounds, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) feature porous structures constructed from metal cations or clusters and organic linking ligands. − This class of materials has attracted a colossal attention in many fields, owing to their structural and chemical tunability, high surface area, controllable morphologies, multiple active sites, adjustable porous structures, and variable chemical functionalities. − Because MOFs can feature π bonding in their structures, the electron transfer between the organic ligands and metals can significantly enhance the NLO effect. − To further improve the NLO performance of these materials, the charge transfer can be tuned by the introduction of strong electron-acceptor/donor groups so that the energy gap can decline by reinforcing the resulting conjugated systems. − Among a variety of MOFs, NU-1000 ([Zr 6 (μ 3 -OH) 4 (μ 3 -O) 4 (OH) 4 (H 2 O) 4 (μ 8 -TBAPy) 2 ], Scheme ) has been regarded as an ideal NLO material because of a diversity of features, which include good stability, high size of pores for postsynthetic modifications, tunable electronic structure with π-conjugated organic linkers, large NLO coefficient, and narrow linear adsorption. − The application of MOFs in the NLO field is, however, accompanied by several limitations such as insufficient thermostability and optical transparency, which can potentially be overcome by blending MOFs with other materials to generate hybrid composites. , …”