2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4935362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fischer decomposition for polynomials on superspace

Abstract: It is well-known that polynomials decompose into spherical harmonics. This result is called separation of variables or the Fischer decomposition. In the paper we prove the Fischer decomposition for spinor valued polynomials in k vector variables of R m under the stable range condition m ≥ 2k. Here the role of spherical harmonics is played by monogenic polynomials, that is, polynomial solutions of the Dirac equation in k vector variables.1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. 30G35, 17B10.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [24] the following generalisation of the Fischer decomposition was obtained that still holds for the exceptional case M ∈ −2N.…”
Section: Spherical Harmonicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [24] the following generalisation of the Fischer decomposition was obtained that still holds for the exceptional case M ∈ −2N.…”
Section: Spherical Harmonicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where now Φ, Ξ belong to the kernel of (5.19). All the steps leading to the system (5.16) remain unchanged except that now one needs to employ the known results [66][67][68] on the structure of polynomial algebras in the supersymmetric case in order to make sure that the ∆ −1 cohomology is concentrated in degree zero in c −− , c 0 , c − -ghosts. In this way one arrives at the system (5.16) but with a, f + belonging to the kernel of (5.19).…”
Section: On-shell Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [19] the following generalisation of the Fischer decomposition was obtained that still holds for the exceptional case M ∈ −2N. Proposition 2.5 (Generalised Fischer decomposition).…”
Section: Preliminaries and Notationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…X = (0, L e k , 0), k = 0. In a similar fashion to(19), we find− SB (L x 0k f ) (z) = − exp(−z 0 ) W I 0 (x|z) exp(−2x 0 )L x 0k f (x) = exp(−z 0 ) W L x 0k (I 0 (x|z) exp(−2x 0 )) f (x) = (x 0 z k + z k x 0 ) I 1 (x|z) exp(−z 0 − 2x 0 )f (x) − 2 SB(x k f )(z).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%