2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12549-019-00405-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fish, amphibian and reptilian faunas from latest Oligocene to middle Miocene localities from Central Turkey

Abstract: In this paper, we describe ectothermic vertebrate assemblages from the Kargı 1, Kargı 2, Kargı 3, Harami1, Harami 3, Hancılı, Keseköy, Çandır and Bağiçi localities in Turkey. The ages of these localities range from the latest Oligocene to the middle Miocene. The preserved non-mammalian fauna of the studied localities includes fishes (Luciobarbus sp., Barbus sp., Luciobarbus vel Barbus sp., aff.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, only additional and more complete specimens from the area can shed light on the chameleon evolution and the taxonomic diversity of this clade in Anatolia during the Miocene. As for the remaining squamates described herein, their fragmentary nature does not afford much biogeographic information but nevertheless they substantially add to the so far poor Miocene fossil record of squamates from Anatolia (see C ̌ernǎnský, Vasilyan, et al, 2017;Georgalis et al, 2018;Syromyatnikova et al, 2019Syromyatnikova et al, , 2022Vasilyan et al, 2019;Georgalis, Mayda, et al, 2020).…”
Section: Paleobiogeographymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, only additional and more complete specimens from the area can shed light on the chameleon evolution and the taxonomic diversity of this clade in Anatolia during the Miocene. As for the remaining squamates described herein, their fragmentary nature does not afford much biogeographic information but nevertheless they substantially add to the so far poor Miocene fossil record of squamates from Anatolia (see C ̌ernǎnský, Vasilyan, et al, 2017;Georgalis et al, 2018;Syromyatnikova et al, 2019Syromyatnikova et al, , 2022Vasilyan et al, 2019;Georgalis, Mayda, et al, 2020).…”
Section: Paleobiogeographymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The application of µCT technology provides researchers with an outstanding view of the development of the pharyngeal jaw and teeth, the mechanism of teeth replacement, as well as morphometric data for comparisons between species and within each species from different body sizes (Bruneel et al, 2015, Pasco-Viel et al, 2010. Therefore, when applying µCT technology for taxonomic identification of archaeological and palaeontological remains, it can be performed in a reliable way, regardless of specimen size (Vasilyan et al, 2019).…”
Section: Tools and Technologies Being Employedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Description and remarks —Both osteoderms are fragmentarily preserved. Their dorsal surface possesses a characteristic ornamentation (e.g., Chroust et al, 2021; Vasilyan et al, 2019) made of a network of rounded deep pits (NMNHU-P 52-165) or of rounded deep pits and radially projecting depressions (NMNHU-P 52-161). The available material cannot be closer identified because of its poor state of preservation.…”
Section: Percidaementioning
confidence: 99%