Fish Associations among Un-notched, Notched and L-head Dikes in the Middle Mississippi River

Abstract

Wing dikes and other anthropogenic modifications have heavily altered riverine ecosystems. Recent efforts to reach a compromise between the needs of the river transportation industry and natural resource conservation include dike modification. Dike notching permits water flow through the landward portion of the dike and has been purported to provide suitable habitat for fish and other river biota while maintaining the navigation channel. L‐head dikes are flow‐control structures that create calm backwater‐like habitats downstream. However, few researchers have examined the actual effects of dike notching on water quality or fish communities. We compared standardized catch per unit effort and overall community structure for 50 fish species among un‐notched dikes, notched dikes and L‐head dikes in the Middle Mississippi River, sampled as part of the US Geological Survey's Long‐Term Resource Monitoring Program. There were no differences in standardized catch per unit effort for 64% of the fishes examined. Five species known to be associated with lotic habitats were most abundant near L‐head dikes. Seven species were more abundant at un‐notched dikes than notched dikes, while six species were more abundant at notched dikes than un‐notched dikes. Non‐metric multidimensional scaling suggested differences in overall fish community structure between un‐notched and other dike types. Detailed physical habitat studies should be conducted to better understand the effects of dike modification. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Increased population size of fish in a lowland river following restoration of structural habitat

“…However, apart from notable programs such as the Upper Mississippi (Braun et al. ) and Rhine (Verweij ) rivers, examples of broad‐scale river restoration successes backed by rigorously designed monitoring, at sufficiently large enough spatial and temporal scales, remain scarce (Fausch et al. ).…”

“…This approach assumes that learning from a few well-monitored interventions will provide more robust evidence for effective application of the interventions elsewhere (Swirepik et al 2015). However, apart from notable programs such as the Upper Mississippi (Braun et al 2016) and Rhine (Verweij 2017) rivers, examples of broad-scale river restoration successes backed by rigorously designed monitoring, at sufficiently large enough spatial and temporal scales, remain scarce (Fausch et al 2002).…”

Experimental Study on Backflow Patterns Induced by a Bilateral Groin Pair with Different Spacing

“…The alternate groins layout was widely used on training large rivers, such as the Mississippi River [44][45][46], Rhine River [47][48][49], Yellow River [50,51] and Yangtze River [52][53][54]. Due to the asymmetric layout, there were significant differences in flow properties between ipsilateral groins and alternate groins.…”

3D Numerical Study of the Flow Properties in a Double-Spur Dikes Field during a Flood Process

“…The importance of the research on local flow field around spur dikes is significant, either to the development of fundamental hydrodynamic theory, or to the actual design and construction of river navigation, scour prevention and ecosystem preservation projects. Over the past century, groyne-related studies on some big rivers such as Mississippi River, Rhine River and Yellow River, have attracted the attention of many scholars and engineers, such as Bowles et al [1], Shields [2], Ten Brinke et al [3], Dong et al [4], Jamieson et al [5], Schloesser et al [6], Braun et al [7].…”