“…As the Yellow River is much larger and also much muddier than the Huai River, the lower watercourse of the latter was proven too narrow for a confluent Yellow‐Huai River, and this had caused frequent floods from both rivers threatening the East China region, which was not only a disaster per se but also caused soil salinization problem, a long‐lasting threat to the region. Based on these facts, some at the time had repeatedly proposed the option to artificially “induce” the Yellow River to restore its old, northward course, such as that by Guifang Wu ( 吴桂芳 , Governor of Canal Transports 1576–1579) and Shibao Chen ( 陈世宝 , Imperial Censor c. 1577) et al in the late 16th century (T. Zhang, 1974), that by Fa Chen ( 陈法 , Governor of North Canal, c. 1730) in the early 18th century (Chen, 2003), and that by Jiagan Sun ( 孙嘉淦 , Governor of Canal Transports c. 1740, and Deputy Imperial Chancellor c. 1750) in the mid‐18th century (Zhao, 1998). However, given the technological capacity at the time, no one would guarantee such a course change would happen under complete control, while the potential costs under the “out of control” scenario would no doubt be an unbearable catastrophe given the fact that the potential flood zone was a densely populated area with tens of millions of residents, as well as a major commercial hub of the country ( Guangxu Huai'an Fuzhi (Records of the Huai'an Prefecture, Guangxu Edition, 光绪淮安府志) , 1991; Zhengde Huai'an Fuzhi (Records of the Huai'an Prefecture, Zhengde Edition, 正德淮安府志) , 2009).…”