2022
DOI: 10.3390/fishes7050219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fish Face Identification Based on Rotated Object Detection: Dataset and Exploration

Abstract: At present, fish farming still uses manual identification methods. With the rapid development of deep learning, the application of computer vision in agriculture and farming to achieve agricultural intelligence has become a current research hotspot. We explored the use of facial recognition in fish. We collected and produced a fish identification dataset with 3412 images and a fish object detection dataset with 2320 images. A rotating box is proposed to detect fish, which avoids the problem where the tradition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FocalLoss is often used to suppress background classes in unbalanced data and target detection ( Li et al, 2022 ). As can be seen in the results of Table 4 for both Group 2 and 3, and Group 7 and 10, the accuracy of the model after FocalLoss processing decreases with the golden crucian carp dataset and the corresponding settings in this article.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FocalLoss is often used to suppress background classes in unbalanced data and target detection ( Li et al, 2022 ). As can be seen in the results of Table 4 for both Group 2 and 3, and Group 7 and 10, the accuracy of the model after FocalLoss processing decreases with the golden crucian carp dataset and the corresponding settings in this article.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When contrasted with the YOLOv3, YOLOv3-TL, YOLOv3-BL, YOLOv4, YOLOv5, Faster-RCNN, and YOLOv7 models, the FD_Net model’s mAP performance is superior. When compared to other target identification algorithms, the mAP displayed unusually high levels of stability and discrimination [ 102 ]. In addition to this, it offers a single-figure evaluation of quality in comparison to memory levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meidell and Sjøblom [16] reports a true positive rate of 96% on 225 thousand images of salmon divided between 715 individuals. Li et al [13] achieved an accuracy of 92% using 3412 images of 10 individuals using their novel FFRNet network. These studies have in common that they were carried out in captivity and are not using temporally indepen-dent observations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%