2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.crm.2015.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fisheries management responses to climate change in the Baltic Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As targeted species continue to shift their distribution under climate change, stock assessments need to innovate towards accounting for environmental change and uncertainty as well as ecosystem dynamics (Funk and Brown, 2009;Karp et al, 2019). A stronger understanding of how environmental variables drive productivity and trophic dynamics can facilitate the development of multispecies and ecosystem-based stock assessments (Thøgersen et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2021). Not only can climate change affect distribution and movement, but it can also lead to changes in recruitment, mortality rate, and productivity (Pankhurst and Munday, 2011;Portner and Peck, 2010).…”
Section: Environmentally Informed Dynamic Stock Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As targeted species continue to shift their distribution under climate change, stock assessments need to innovate towards accounting for environmental change and uncertainty as well as ecosystem dynamics (Funk and Brown, 2009;Karp et al, 2019). A stronger understanding of how environmental variables drive productivity and trophic dynamics can facilitate the development of multispecies and ecosystem-based stock assessments (Thøgersen et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2021). Not only can climate change affect distribution and movement, but it can also lead to changes in recruitment, mortality rate, and productivity (Pankhurst and Munday, 2011;Portner and Peck, 2010).…”
Section: Environmentally Informed Dynamic Stock Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Com efeito, identificamos dois eixos discursivos: a) um primeiro baseado nas ciências naturais, que investiga a influência da acidificação e aquecimento dos oceanos sobre a monetarização dos ecossistemas e organismos marinhos, incluindo os estoques pesqueiros (BARANGE;PERRY, 2009;GATTUSO et al, 2015;TURLEY;GATTUSO, 2012). A natureza é aqui concebida como algo a ser preservado de forma intacta com vistas a manter o equilíbrio ecossistêmico, e o aquecimento global tende a ser visto como um problema a ser erradicado; b) o segundo eixo das análises econômicas, alicerçado nas ciências sociais, investiga os impactos das mudanças climáticas sobre a atividade pesqueira e seus mercados (ALLISON et al, 2009;CASTRO et al, 2010;COCHRANE et al, 2009;GAMITO et al, 2015;NORMAN-LÓPEZ et al, 2013;THØGERSEN;HOFF;FROST, 2015).…”
Section: Oceanos Pesca E Mudanças Climáticas: Onde Estão As Ciênciasunclassified
“…Several studies had projected that much of the Baltic Sea could become close to completely fresh by 2100, with detrimental impacts on its communities currently adapted to brackishwater conditions (Janssen et al 1999;Meier et al 2006;Kniebusch et al 2019). For instance, a 2 PSU salinity decline was predicted to result in a 3-fold reduction in biomass of the commercially important Baltic Sea cod fishery (Thøgersen et al 2015). However, a more recent study casts doubt on earlier model projections, predicting increased vertical salinity gradients and stratification in the Baltic Sea, rather than an overall precipitous salinity decline (Meier et al 2021).…”
Section: Introduction: Rapid Salinity Transformations Across the Globementioning
confidence: 99%