2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2020.101108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fisheries management tools to support coastal and marine spatial planning: A case study from the Northern Gulf of California, Mexico

Abstract: A management approach was developed that combined spatial and non-spatial tools to inform a Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Process (CMSP) in the Puerto Peñasco-Puerto Lobos Coastal Corridor, Northern Gulf of California, Sonora, Mexico. Four fisheries management tools were applied with an emphasis on ecosystem level management for eleven small-scale fisheries. Two spatial management tools, using a spatial prioritization approach, were combined with a permit regularization process, a non-spatial quota prior… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vast majority of the studies (91%) compared fisheries and conservation activities, while a minority considered planning that balances other uses. Spatial planning exercises documented by our review included planning for aquaculture (Maina et al, 2021), renewable energy (Yates et al, 2015), maritime shipping (Dosell et al, 2021), spatial fishery management areas (such as fishery refuges or locally managed areas: Maina et al, 2021;Morzaria-Luna et al, 2020) or assessed hypothetical closures without an explicit objective (Bastardie et al, 2014). patterns as a cost (85%).…”
Section: Us E Of Fis Herie S Data In S Patial Pl Anningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vast majority of the studies (91%) compared fisheries and conservation activities, while a minority considered planning that balances other uses. Spatial planning exercises documented by our review included planning for aquaculture (Maina et al, 2021), renewable energy (Yates et al, 2015), maritime shipping (Dosell et al, 2021), spatial fishery management areas (such as fishery refuges or locally managed areas: Maina et al, 2021;Morzaria-Luna et al, 2020) or assessed hypothetical closures without an explicit objective (Bastardie et al, 2014). patterns as a cost (85%).…”
Section: Us E Of Fis Herie S Data In S Patial Pl Anningmentioning
confidence: 99%