2011
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(11)60040-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fit of single tooth zirconia copings: comparison between various manufacturing processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
60
4
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
60
4
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For the manual adapted copings, the mean marginal gaps varied from 54 to 59.9 μm. This is in accordance with marginal gaps reported for CAD/ CAM-generated zirconia copings in other studies, in which marginal gaps ranged from 24 to 110 μm 6,11,14,15,31) . The large variation in the reported mean values can be explained by a number of infl uencing factors, including CAD/CAM components and differences between presintered and post-sintered milling of the zirconia blank.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the manual adapted copings, the mean marginal gaps varied from 54 to 59.9 μm. This is in accordance with marginal gaps reported for CAD/ CAM-generated zirconia copings in other studies, in which marginal gaps ranged from 24 to 110 μm 6,11,14,15,31) . The large variation in the reported mean values can be explained by a number of infl uencing factors, including CAD/CAM components and differences between presintered and post-sintered milling of the zirconia blank.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Clinically, the fi t of all-ceramic restorations is infl uenced by factors that simulate oral conditions, such as the veneering technique, cementation methodology, and aging process, which have not been evaluated in the present study 33) . Furthermore, the preparations of the artifi cial abutments were idealized and thus do not refl ect the conditions of daily clinical practice 14) . A disadvantage of the measurement of marginal gaps with a light microscope is the two-dimensional display format, which only allows for the detection of vertical discrepancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Во многих исследованиях продемонстрировано, что нарушение краевого прилега-ния реставраций, изготовленных методом CAD/CAM, ас-социировано с различными факторами, например, таки-ми как вид границы препарирования, толщина слоя лака на гипсовой модели, тип материала для цементирования [10][11][12][13]. Более того, существуют разные мнения по пово-ду используемого программного обеспечения, точности фрезерования и их влияния на посадку CAD/CAM-реставрации [14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: стоматология 5 2016unclassified
“…During the past few decades various impression and die materials have been used in dentistry, [1][2][3] and marginal and internal fit has been determined using a variety of measuring techniques: cementing on extracted teeth or replicas and subsequent slicing of the restorations and the teeth/replicas, [4][5][6] direct measurement with light microscope, 7,8 or replica technique with polyvinylsiloxane impression materials. [9][10] Currently, most impression materials have to be sent by mail and/or courier to dental laboratories despite the possible risk of the impressions being disease carriers as disinfection of impression materials is problematic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%