Encyclopedia of Life Sciences 2007
DOI: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0020094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fitness Costs of Plant Disease Resistance

Abstract: Disease is a major agent of evolution by natural selection because infection by a parasite reduces the fitness of its host, yet all plants suffer from disease. This paradox can be explained if host resistance to disease is most beneficial when most plants are susceptible, and if resistance reduces a plant's fitness in the absence of the parasite. Fitness costs of disease resistance may arise in several ways: physiological and metabolic costs of defence against parasites, developmental traits which allow plants… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that there was no full adaptation to Mla ‐based resistance in the pathogen population, indicating a long‐term evolutionary stability, in stark contrast to agricultural environments. This suggests that the evolutionary forces are very different in agricultural versus natural environments, where fitness costs of R genes might favour balancing evolution instead of selective sweeps (Brown, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that there was no full adaptation to Mla ‐based resistance in the pathogen population, indicating a long‐term evolutionary stability, in stark contrast to agricultural environments. This suggests that the evolutionary forces are very different in agricultural versus natural environments, where fitness costs of R genes might favour balancing evolution instead of selective sweeps (Brown, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a wide range of models, the frequency of RES at equilibrium is approximately equal to the cost of avr and the frequency of AVR is approximately proportional to the cost of RES (38,71,74,120). This is the result of negative feedback in the host-parasite interaction, so the ultimate effect of increasing the cost of avr is to increase the frequency of RES, leaving the frequency of avr unchanged, while increasing the cost of RES reduces the frequency of avr (Figure 3; see also 20,38).…”
Section: Costs Of Resistance and Virulencementioning
confidence: 96%
“…The cyclical dynamics of RES and avr frequencies depend on fitness costs causing those alleles to be removed from the population once they no longer benefit the host or parasite. Costs of resistance in plant disease have been reviewed elsewhere (14,18,20). Several types of cost have been attributed to RES genes involved in GFG interactions.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species are characterized by different fitness-related traits and strategies that were shaped by tradeoffs that constrain investment of resources in certain functions at the expense of others in the context of resource limitation [36,[78][79][80]. For example, investment in resistance to infection by parasites can be associated with a fitness cost and has been shown to vary according to host lifespan [36,37,81]. Across kingdoms, short-lived species (e.g.…”
Section: Host Ubiquity and Competence For Pathogen Spreadmentioning
confidence: 99%