2019 International Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Symposium - China (ACES) 2019
DOI: 10.23919/aces48530.2019.9060806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fitting EM Scattering of 3D Rough Surface using Deep Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Carlo sequences [131] are a form of multiple optimiza-tions, which is also noted in [132] tion as a route to circumventing high wave number problems. Deep neural networks as used to model all-dielectric metasurfaces can also be trained to predict performance at the atomic scale [144], which the researchers validated by comparing direct results against full-wave simulations using a commercial electromagnetic simulator. Magnusson and co-workers [143] use deep neural networks focused on improving the functionality of optical devices.…”
Section: Gradient-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Carlo sequences [131] are a form of multiple optimiza-tions, which is also noted in [132] tion as a route to circumventing high wave number problems. Deep neural networks as used to model all-dielectric metasurfaces can also be trained to predict performance at the atomic scale [144], which the researchers validated by comparing direct results against full-wave simulations using a commercial electromagnetic simulator. Magnusson and co-workers [143] use deep neural networks focused on improving the functionality of optical devices.…”
Section: Gradient-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With time, it will be integrated into all levels of technology readiness, becoming commonplace as an assistive tool in the computational design of metamaterials. Weng, Ding, Hu, et al [266] 2020 Deep Learning Classification 10 Melo Filho, Angeli, Ophem, et al [267] 2020 ANN Inverse Design 11 Chen, Lu, Karniadakis, et al [268] 2020 Deep Learning Inverse Design 12 Kollmann, Abueidda, Koric, et al [269] 2020 Deep Learning Optimization Framework 13 Qu, Zhu, Shen, et al [270] 2020 ANN Optimization Framework 14 Lai, Amirkulova, and Gerstoft [271] 2021 CNN, GAN Inverse Design 15 Gurbuz, Kronowetter, Dietz, et al [272] 2021 GAN Inverse Design 16 Amirkulova, Tran, and Khatami [273] 2021 Deep Learning Inverse Design 17 Wu, Liu, Jahanshahi, et al [274] 2021 ANN Inverse Design 18 Shah, Zhuo, Lai, et al [275] 2021 RL Optimization Framework 19 Tran, Amirkulova, and Khatami [276] 2022 ANN Inverse Design 20 Wiest, Seepersad, and Haberman [277] 2022 GNN Inverse Design 21 Amirkulova, Zhou, Abbas, et al [278] 2022 Deep Learning Inverse Design 22 Tran, Khatami, and Amirkulova [279] 2022 CNN Inverse Design 23 Li, Chen, Li, et al [280] 2023 CNN Inverse Design 24 Li, Chen, Li, et al [281] 2023 Deep Learning Inverse Design 25 Wang, Chen, Xu, et al [282] 2023 ANN Inverse Design Application field: Electromagnetics 26 Jiang, Xiao, Liu, et al [283] 2010 ANN and scaled conjugate Surrogate model gradient 27 Freitas, Rêgo, and Vasconcelos [140] 2011 ANN Surrogate model 28 Vasconcelos, Rêgo, and Cruz [139] 2012 ANN Surrogate model 29 Sarmah, Sarma, and Baruah [172] 2015 ANN optimization framework 30 Saha and Maity [138] 2016 ANN Surrogate model 31 Nanda, Sahu, and Mishra [108] 2019 ANN Inverse design 32 An, Fowler, Shalaginov, et al [144] 2019 ANN Surrogate model 33 Yuze, Hai, and Qinglin [157] 2019 CNN Classification and clustering 34 Liu, Zhang, and Cui [156] 2019 CNN optimization framework 35 Hodge, Mishra, and Zaghloul [284] 2019 DC-GAN Inverse design 36 Hodge, Mishra, and Zaghloul…”
Section: The Causal Relationship Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%