2022
DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2022.2053857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fitting Structural Equation Models via Variational Approximations

Abstract: Structural equation models (SEMs) are commonly used to study the structural relationship between observed variables and latent constructs. Recently, Bayesian fitting procedures for SEMs have received more attention thanks to their potential to facilitate the adoption of more flexible model structures, and variational approximations have been shown to provide fast and accurate inference for Bayesian analysis of SEMs. However, the application of variational approximations is currently limited to very simple, ele… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variational inference (e.g., Anderson & Peterson, 1987; Hinton & Van Camp, 1993) based on the Bayesian approach is promising, which can inherit many of MCMC’s benefits and balance computational efficiency and accuracy at the same time. Recently, this algorithm had been introduced under the FA and structural equation modeling context (Dang & Maestrini, 2022; Khan et al, 2010), which can provide a basis for its implementation under the revised GPCFA framework. From the structure perspective, extensions of the GPCFA to accommodate more variants such as the three-parameter testlet effect model are worth exploring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variational inference (e.g., Anderson & Peterson, 1987; Hinton & Van Camp, 1993) based on the Bayesian approach is promising, which can inherit many of MCMC’s benefits and balance computational efficiency and accuracy at the same time. Recently, this algorithm had been introduced under the FA and structural equation modeling context (Dang & Maestrini, 2022; Khan et al, 2010), which can provide a basis for its implementation under the revised GPCFA framework. From the structure perspective, extensions of the GPCFA to accommodate more variants such as the three-parameter testlet effect model are worth exploring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fast approximate inference, such as variational Bayes methods (Attias 1999) could potentially be used instead. However, variational inference is currently only available for very simple SEMs (Dang & Maestrini 2022) and the black‐box algorithm in STAN is not accurate for even the simple models. Second, the model does not fit non‐normal outcomes very well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Simulation 2 indicated underestimation of posterior SDs and the coverage of 95% CI of the VB method. A bootstrap procedure in conjunction with the VB method (Dang & Maestrini, 2022) can be used to address this problem. This procedure randomly selects a bootstrap sample and applies the VB method to obtain multiple VB estimates.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%