Five challenges to ethical communication for interprofessional paediatric practice: A social work perspective

Abstract

In paediatric clinical care, what is said to a parent or carer as well as when, where, and how it is said, directly advances or diminishes parents' capacities to understand available options and to contribute to decisions about treatment for their child. This makes interprofessional and patient communication an ethical endeavour. Social workers are uniquely situated to observe, participate in, and provide an active link in the communication between families and other health team members. This article reports phenomenological research exploring ethical issues encountered by social workers in their everyday practice communicating with families and other health professionals in a paediatric hospital context in Australia. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews with nine social workers and analysed thematically. Participants described two main communication-based roles: to support families through information provision and to contribute collaboratively to the interprofessional team involved in caring for a child and family. We grouped participants' descriptions of conflict between these roles into five main "communication challenges": (1) holding troublesome knowledge; (2) the need for diplomacy; (3) conciliation; (4) every man and his dog in family meetings; and (5) systems and processes presenting a brick wall. The five communication challenges provide empirically derived examples of how communication occurring within interprofessional health teams and between individual clinicians and parents can act to diminish or enhance parents' experience of care for their hospitalised child. Identifying these challenges may help to inform how communication within interprofessional teams and between clinicians and patients can benefit children and their parents.

Parents’ experiences of an e-health intervention implemented in pediatric healthcare: a qualitative study

“…Optimal communication between children and healthcare professionals is crucial for children’s participation in their own healthcare [7], allowing them to be listened to and being given explanations in a way they understand [8] as well as being an actor in decision-making [3, 9]. Other factors that impact this communication are parents’ values, personal wishes and sociocultural background, healthcare professionals’ attitudes, the capacity of the child, and the seriousness of the matter being discussed [9, 10].…”

Trabajo interprofesional en Chile Impactos de la racionalidad neoliberal y los horizontes de la justicia social

“…Que los niveles centrales dejen un "vacío" en torno a las orientaciones para ejecutar el mandato de la intervención interprofesional en terreno (punto i) no es necesariamente un problema, si es que las condiciones de operación son apropiadas, pues esto podría, precisamente, dar lugar a la creatividad y a la actoría de profesionales en la primera línea (Thompson y Wadley, 2018). Pero la inestabilidad que experimentan los equipos interprofesionales y su rotación constante impide la construcción de una forma de ver y de intervenir un problema social, asunto que requiere tiempo, habilidades, orientación, y desarrollo de confianzas, espacios de intercambio y discusión (Delany, Richards, Stewart, & Kosta, 2017). En este contexto de deterioro de las condiciones laborales de los/as profesionales que están en la primera línea es extremadamente difícil sostener el trabajo conjunto, acumular aprendizajes colectivos y aun menos de convertirlo en algo efectivo para los usuarios.…”

Best practices on team communication: interprofessional practice in oncology

“…Palliative care has developed standards of practice and evidence-based knowledge related to interprofessional communication, collaboration and techniques (such as giving bad news and conducting family meetings). In paediatric oncology, communication can be complex and emotionally charged [32]. In addition, the traditionally paternalistic medical hierarchical structure within units and departments contributes to breakdowns in communication across the care team [33].…”