2007
DOI: 10.3233/ies-2007-0253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Five-repetition sit-to-stand test performance by community-dwelling adults: A preliminary investigation of times, determinants, and relationship with self-reported physical performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
60
2
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
60
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study demonstrate excellent inter-rater reliability of the FTSTS comparable to that reported in chronic stroke (ICC =0.99)[15]. Test-retest reliability of the FTSTS in PD is also comparable to that of other populations (ICC range 0.64–0.96)[11,3336]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The results of this study demonstrate excellent inter-rater reliability of the FTSTS comparable to that reported in chronic stroke (ICC =0.99)[15]. Test-retest reliability of the FTSTS in PD is also comparable to that of other populations (ICC range 0.64–0.96)[11,3336]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This should be a brisk walk, but please, no running.”. Sit-to-stand times were measured as the time to stand up and sit down five times as quickly as possible from a standard-height chair [Bohannon 2007, 2012]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maneuver is relatively demanding from a neuromuscular perspective2 ) and is affected negatively by age and pathology3,4,5,6 ) . It should not be surprising, therefore, that repeated STSs are a common component of exercise regimens directed at older adults and patients with stroke or other pathologies7,8,9,10,11 ) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%