Five times sit-to-stand test in subjects with total knee replacement: Reliability and relationship with functional mobility tests

Medina-Mirapeix, Françesc; Vivo-Fernández, Iván; López-Cañizares, Juan; García-Vidal, José Antonio; Benítez-Martínez, Josep C; Baño-Aledo, María Elena del

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.10.028

Cited by 30 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The five times sit-to-stand (5STS) [ 27 ] test measured functional performance in subjects with knee OA. The individual sits against the chair with arms folded across the chest.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Association between Kinesiophobia and Knee Pain Intensity, Joint Position Sense, and Functional Performance in Individuals with Bilateral Knee Osteoarthritis

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In current clinical practice, fear of movement has been considered a significant factor affecting patient disability and needs to be evaluated and addressed to accomplish successful rehabilitation strategies. Therefore, the study aims (1) to establish the association between kinesiophobia and knee pain intensity, joint position sense (JPS), and functional performance, and (2) to determine whether kinesiophobia predicts pain intensity, JPS, and functional performance among individuals with bilateral knee osteoarthritis (KOA). This cross-sectional study included 50 participants (mean age: 67.10 ± 4.36 years) with KOA. Outcome measures: The level of kinesiophobia was assessed using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, pain intensity using a visual analog scale (VAS), knee JPS using a digital inclinometer, and functional performance using five times sit-to-stand test. Knee JPS was assessed in target angles of 15°, 30°, and 60°. Pearson’s correlation coefficients and simple linear regressions were used to analyze the data. Significant moderate positive correlations were observed between kinesiophobia and pain intensity (r = 0.55, p < 0.001), JPS (r ranged between 0.38 to 0.5, p < 0.05), and functional performance (r = 0.49, p < 0.001). Simple linear regression analysis showed kinesiophobia significantly predicted pain intensity (B = 1.05, p < 0.001), knee JPS (B ranged between 0.96 (0° of knee flexion, right side) to 1.30 (15° of knee flexion, right side)), and functional performance (B = 0.57, p < 0.001). We can conclude that kinesiophobia is significantly correlated and predicted pain intensity, JPS, and functional performance in individuals with KOA. Kinesiophobia is a significant aspect of the recovery process and may be taken into account when planning and implementing rehabilitation programs for KOA individuals.

show abstract

“…The five times sit-to-stand (5STS) [ 27 ] test measured functional performance in subjects with knee OA. The individual sits against the chair with arms folded across the chest.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is a timed test, and the individuals are instructed to rise to a standing position from the seated position (43 cm high armless chair) five times as quickly as possible [ 27 ]. This test showed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.95), and it is a valid measure of functional mobility in older individuals [ 28 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Association between Kinesiophobia and Knee Pain Intensity, Joint Position Sense, and Functional Performance in Individuals with Bilateral Knee Osteoarthritis

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…a range of medical conditions, including lumbar degenerative spine disease, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Parkinson disease, rheumatoid arthritis, postkidney transplant, and posttotal knee replacement to not only objectively assess functional impairment, but also to monitor recovery and progress. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] It is also used in the pediatric setting. 13 Objective functional tests can eliminate subjectivity that is at times captured in questionnaires, and account for symptoms such as foot drop missed by common Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.…”

Section: Neurospine Eissn 2586-6591 Pissn 2586-6583mentioning

confidence: 99%

Five-Repetition Sit-to-Stand Test Performance in Healthy Individuals: Reference Values and Predictors From 2 Prospective Cohorts

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The 5-repetition-sit-to-stand (5R-STS) test is an objective test of functional impairment- commonly used in various diseases, including lumbar degenerative disc diseases. It is used to measure the severity of disease and to monitor recovery. We aimed to evaluate reference values for the test, as well as factors predicting 5R-STS performance in healthy adults.Methods: Healthy adults ( > 18 years of age) were recruited, and their 5R-STS time was measured. Their age, sex, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, education level, work situation and EuroQOL-5D Healthy & Anxiety category were recorded. Linear regression analysis was employed to identify predictors of 5R-STS performance.Results: We included 172 individuals with mean age of 39.4 ± 14.1 years and mean BMI of 24.0 ± 4.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Females constituted 57%. Average 5R-STS time was 6.21 ± 1.92 seconds, with an upper limit of normal of 12.39 seconds. In a multivariable model, age (regression coefficient [RC], 0.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05/0.09; p < 0.001), male sex (RC, -0.87; 95% CI, -1.50 to -0.23; p = 0.008), BMI (RC, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.10–0.71; p = 0.010), height (RC, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.04–0.22; p = 0.006), and houseworker status (RC, -1.62; 95% CI, -2.93 to -0.32; p = 0.016) were significantly associated with 5R-STS time. Anxiety and depression did not influence performance significantly (RC, 0.82; 95% CI, -0.14 to 1.77; p = 0.097).Conclusion: The presented reference values can be applied as normative data for 5R-STS in healthy adults, and are necessary to judge what constitutes abnormal performance. We identified several significant factors associated with 5R-STS performance that may be used to calculate individualized expected test times.

show abstract

“…The scientific literature has described the STS as a reliable test for assessing lower extremity muscle strength in young, healthy elderly and stroke patients [ 51 ]. A significant correlation has also been demonstrated with other functional mobility tests in patients with total knee replacement [ 52 ]. This test has also been used to observe the effect of oxygen therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), showing that it is an excellent alternative to evaluate the functional capacity in this type of patient without the need for large implements [ 53 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…In turn, the STS has been used as a standard functional balance test in children with cerebral palsy, proving to be a reliable test to assess this physical disability [ 54 ]. As it has become evident, the STS has functional applications in both healthy populations [ 51 ] and patients with various pathologies [ 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 ], proving to be a good indicator of strength, balance and functional capacity. Independently of this and increasing the reliability of the STS, influenced by the biological differences of the participants [ 49 ] or by the variations in the instruments used [ 44 ], We recommend including a familiarization session before data acquisition.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Test–Retest Reliability of Functional Electromechanical Dynamometer on Five Sit-to-Stand Measures in Healthy Young Adults

Jerez‐Mayorga

Ojeda

Chirosa

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability for the strength and movement velocity of the concentric phase from the five Sit-to-Stand (5STS), using three incremental loads measured by a functional electromechanical dynamometer (FEMD) in healthy young adults. Methods: The average and peak strength and velocity values of sixteen healthy adults (mean ± standard deviation (SD): age = 22.81 ± 2.13 years) were recorded at 5, 10 and 15 kg. To evaluate the reliability of FEMD, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and coefficient of variation (CV) were obtained. Results: Reliability was high for the 10 kg (CV range: 3.70–4.18%, ICC range: 0.95–0.98) and 15 kg conditions (CV range: 1.64–3.02%, ICC: 0.99) at average and peak strength, and reliability was high for the 5 kg (CV range: 1.71–2.84%, ICC range: 0.96–0.99), 10 kg (CV range: 0.74–1.84%, ICC range: 0.99–1.00) and 15 kg conditions (CV range: 0.79–3.11%, ICC range: 0.99–1.00) at average and peak velocity. Conclusions: The findings of this study demonstrate that FEMD is a reliable instrument to measure the average and peak strength and velocity values during the five STS in healthy young adults.

show abstract

Five times sit-to-stand test in subjects with total knee replacement: Reliability and relationship with functional mobility tests

Cited by 30 publications

References 11 publications

Association between Kinesiophobia and Knee Pain Intensity, Joint Position Sense, and Functional Performance in Individuals with Bilateral Knee Osteoarthritis

Association between Kinesiophobia and Knee Pain Intensity, Joint Position Sense, and Functional Performance in Individuals with Bilateral Knee Osteoarthritis

Five-Repetition Sit-to-Stand Test Performance in Healthy Individuals: Reference Values and Predictors From 2 Prospective Cohorts

Test–Retest Reliability of Functional Electromechanical Dynamometer on Five Sit-to-Stand Measures in Healthy Young Adults

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About