2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2021.11.002
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fixation and effective size in a haploid–diploid population with asexual reproduction

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our fixation probability results deviate drastically from these classical expectations, a disparity that is consistent with the findings of other studies. In models of haploid–diploid populations (populations with a mixture of haploid and diploid individuals, with asexual reproduction), Bessho and Otto ( 2022 ) found that the presence and degree of asexual reproduction (i.e., cloning) is expected to alter fixation probability and that the relative reproductive output of haploid versus diploid life stages greatly affects the strength of natural selection versus genetic drift. Of course, our models also violate many assumptions of these classical models, including variable N (and therefore, variable N e ), and the alternation‐of‐generations life cycle itself, in addition to the presence of cloning in our realistic parameter simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our fixation probability results deviate drastically from these classical expectations, a disparity that is consistent with the findings of other studies. In models of haploid–diploid populations (populations with a mixture of haploid and diploid individuals, with asexual reproduction), Bessho and Otto ( 2022 ) found that the presence and degree of asexual reproduction (i.e., cloning) is expected to alter fixation probability and that the relative reproductive output of haploid versus diploid life stages greatly affects the strength of natural selection versus genetic drift. Of course, our models also violate many assumptions of these classical models, including variable N (and therefore, variable N e ), and the alternation‐of‐generations life cycle itself, in addition to the presence of cloning in our realistic parameter simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter can also be an important mediator of maternal effects (Jesson et al, 2012 ; Chettoor et al, 2016 ). Despite the many potential effects of the gametophyte life stage on patterns of genome evolution, we lack a model‐based framework for predicting these effects, and studies exploring the impact of alternation of generations on evolutionary processes are few (Hoban et al, 2012 ; Bessho and Otto, 2022 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the burn‐in period, the pathogen population only evolves on S. To reach the genetic drift and mutation equilibrium from the initial state, the burn‐in period is set to 2N generations. For a diploid organism with frequent sexual reproduction, 2N generations are sufficient to reach a steady state (Bessho & Otto, 2022; Hartfield, 2021; Reichel et al, 2016). We build a random simulation design of 150,000 simulations, with input parameter values drawn randomly from defined prior distributions (Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genetic material of most organisms in nature, including humans, contains two sets of chromosomes, one from the mother and the other from the father, called diploid organisms. Diploidy has many advantages, such as effectively preventing the elimination of organisms due to recessive deleterious mutations and maintaining the relative stability of genetics and the biosphere [ 1 , 2 ]. It also increases genetic diversity through interspecific hybridization, which promotes biological evolution and the creation of new species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%