A pressing challenge in arsenic (As) adsorptive filtration is to decipher how the As atomic surface structure obtained in the laboratory can be used to accurately predict the field filtration cycle. The motivation of this study was therefore to integrate molecular level As adsorption mechanisms and capacities to predict effluent As from granular TiO 2 columns in the field as well as its health impacts. Approximately 2,955 bed volumes of groundwater with an average of 542 μg/L As were filtered before the effluent As concentration exceeded 10 μg/L, corresponding to an adsorption capacity of 1.53 mg As/g TiO 2 .After regeneration, the TiO 2 column could treat 2,563 bed volumes of groundwater, resulting in an As load of 1.36 mg/g TiO 2 . Column filtration and EXAFS results showed that among coexisting ions present in groundwater, only Ca 2+ , Si(OH) 4 , and HCO 3 − would interfere with As adsorption. The compound effects of coexisting ions and molecular level structural information were incorporated in the PHREEQC program to satisfactorily predict the As breakthrough curves. The total urinary As concentration from four volunteers of local residences, ranging from 972 to 2,080 μg/L before groundwater treatment, decreased to the range 31.7−73.3 μg/L at the end of the experimental cycle (15− 33 days).
■ INTRODUCTIONAdsorptive filtration is one of the most cost-effective and userfriendly techniques to provide arsenic (As) safe drinking water in geogenic As contaminated areas.1,2 Integration of mounting molecular-level evidence over the past decade has shown that the mechanism of As adsorption mainly involves the formation of bidentate binuclear inner sphere surface complexes.
3−5Although substantial progress has improved our understanding of batch and field filtration experiments, a pressing challenge is to decipher how the molecular-level mechanism obtained in the laboratory can be used to accurately predict the field filtration cycle.Rethinking the failure in prediction of field filtration breakthrough curves using parameters obtained with batch experiments, we realized that the adsorption kinetics might not be the critical contributor, as initially thought. The difference in reaction kinetics between batch complete-mixed and column flow-through conditions has long been recognized and solved by incorporating a nonequilibrium kinetics block in simulation code such as PHREEQC. 6,7 On the other hand, even without the kinetics block, the adsorptive filtration of As(III) in synthetic water matrices through iron-oxide-coated rock can be successfully modeled. 8 This success may be attributed to instantaneous uptake of As by most metal oxides. However, a real difficulty surfaces when predicting the groundwater As breakthrough curves in field columns, even with the kinetics block and additional As adsorption reactions. 8,9 The compound effects of groundwater matrices on As adsorption cannot be overstated.Groundwater As adsorption on metal oxides can be suppressed or enhanced in the presence of coexisting ions. Previo...