“…for all k, l ∈ L with k ≠ Nk and l ≠ Nl, where ζ ∈ [0, 1) and ϑ ∈ (0, 1). After that, many existing contraction-type conditions have been generalized in the sense of interpolative Kannan contraction, for example, Karapınar et al [9] studied interpolative Reich-Rus-Ćirić type contraction in partial metric spaces, Aydi et al [10] studied interpolative Ćirić-Reich-Rus type contractions in Branciari metric spaces, Mohammadi et al [11] extended the concept of F-contractions by interpolative Ćirić-Reich-Rus type F-contractions, Karapınar et al [12] studied interpolative Hardy-Rogers type contractions, Debnath and Sen [13] studied set-valued interpolative Hardy-Rogers and set-valued Reich-Rus-Ćirić-type contractions, Sarwar et al [14] presented rational type interpolative contractions, Khan et al [15] worked on interpolative (ϕ, ψ)-type Z-contractions, Altun and Tasdemir [16] presented interpolative proximal contractions for nonself mappings, Fulga and Yesilkaya [17] studied interpolative Suzuki-type contractions, Karapınar et al [18] defined (α, β, ψ, ϕ)-interpolative contractions, and Alansari and Ali [19] studied multivalued interpolative Reich-Rus-Ćirić-type contractions. Gaba and Karapınar [20] extended the notion of interpolative Kannan contraction through exponential powers, stated as, a map N:…”