1982
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.1810080407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fixed vs nonfixed coronary stenosis: The response to a fall in coronary pressure in a canine model

Abstract: The resistance of a coronary stenosis capable of passive vasomotion may change in response to alterations in intraluminal pressure. We studied the effects of a fall in perfusion pressure on the hemodynamics of two types of coronary stenosis in 12 open chest dogs: 1) a stenosis produced by placing a soft wire snare around the artery, and 2) a stenosis that was fixed in severity, produced by introducing and tying a short section of hollow plastic tubing into the coronary artery. Aortic pressure, coronary pressur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Walinsky et al (1979) did suggest that collaterals have a limited role during distal vasodilation. Vasodilation caused by drug infusion, ischemia or hypoxia was associated with normal pressure and re sistance decreases distal to the stenosis along with increased stenosis resistance (Young, 1979;Schwartz et al, 1979Schwartz et al, , 1980. This led to potentiation of the hemodynamic severity of the stenosis.…”
Section: Collateral Blood Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walinsky et al (1979) did suggest that collaterals have a limited role during distal vasodilation. Vasodilation caused by drug infusion, ischemia or hypoxia was associated with normal pressure and re sistance decreases distal to the stenosis along with increased stenosis resistance (Young, 1979;Schwartz et al, 1979Schwartz et al, , 1980. This led to potentiation of the hemodynamic severity of the stenosis.…”
Section: Collateral Blood Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6) remained unchanged throughout the experiment. Young et al, 1977;Schwartz et al, 1979Schwartz et al, , 1980. Bulle, 1957;Daicoff et al, 1968;Gladkova and Vasiliev, 1971;Schaub et al, 1976;Kordenat and Kezdi, 1979).…”
Section: Universi^ Micrisilms Internationalmentioning
confidence: 99%