Flagship enterprises, entrepreneurial clusters, and business entry rates: insights from the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship

Anokhin, Sergey; Chistyakova, Natalia; Antonova, Irina S.; Spitsina, Lyubov; Wincent, Joakim; Parida, Vinit

doi:10.1080/08985626.2021.1872942

Cited by 11 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 83 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…At the corporate level, the drivers of CEWS engagement have been a combination of vision fit, strategic fit, open innovation model and the degree of R&D focus, which ensure that the dynamic capabilities are shaped and developed by the knowledge gained through the mode of engagement (Huizingh, 2017). Supportive government policies and the presence of opportunities for innovation are also motivators for start-ups to seek engagement (Anokhin et al , 2021). At the start-up level, knowledge embeddedness, resource sharing, flexibility of integration policy and innovation culture-fit drive the engagement.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…“what are the contexts and prominent theory perspectives used to look at CEWS modes?”, the majority of the studies were from the UK, the USA and Europe, while few studies were from the emerging contexts. The theory lenses mostly used were strategic alliance theory (Aharonson et al , 2020; Anokhin et al , 2021), resource-based view (Wouters et al , 2018; Bergman and McMullen, 2022), complementary asset profiling (Kolokas et al , 2022) and open innovation (Amit and Han, 2017).…”

Section: Findings From Review Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Corporate strategy mode was the most explored one in CEWS, as 16 out of 63 articles focused on this. Corporate strategy has been investigated in tech-based and innovative industries like information and communications technology (ICT) and R&D intensive sectors in the USA and Europe (Baloutsos et al , 2020; Enkel and Sagmeister, 2020), strategic alliance theory (Aharonson et al , 2020; Anokhin et al , 2021) and resource-based view (Wouters et al , 2018; Bergman and McMullen, 2022) have been predominantly used to look at the corporate strategy mode. Few scholars have also used the knowledge perspective (Huizingh, 2017; Galkina et al , 2022), network modelling (Audretsch et al , 2020; Valeri, 2021) and stakeholder alignment (Enkel and Sagmeister, 2020) to capture the motivations driving the corporate strategy mode.…”

Section: Findings From Review Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Corporate engagement with start-ups (CEWS): a systematic review of literature and future research agenda

Jha,

Singh,

Basu

2024

EBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide a systematic review of literature on corporate engagement with start-ups (CEWS) by identifying the modes, contexts, antecedents, barriers and outcomes. As an emerging field, CEWS presently has no such review available which will help in building consensus within the field and shape future research directions. Design/methodology/approach The study followed a two-phased systematic review of literature. Three research databases (i.e. Web of Science, ScienceDirect and SCOPUS) were accessed to gather and conduct the review. Of the total 379 papers retrieved, 63 total relevant papers were studied and analysed. The exhaustive review of literature helped to uncover the contexts, perspectives, antecedents, outcomes and barriers reported across the different modes of CEWS. Findings The study highlighted the five prominent modes of CEWS favoured by large corporations and start-ups. It found that the large corporations and start-ups associate with one another on the basis of complementarities of activities, resources and motives to pursue their strategic orientations. The engagements also face barriers on the ground, such as incompatibility of goals, power imbalances, cultural differences and weak engagement plans. Most important contexts seen were the high-technology industries in the developed economies like the USA and Europe. It also found that ecosystem creation, accessing innovation and corporate strategy have been preferred as the most productive modes of CEWS in the literature. Practical implications This review provides practitioners with a detailed list of the modes and drivers of CEWS. Subsequently, the barriers that need to be managed to successfully execute a specific mode of engagement. This shall enable the practitioners in developing and adopting the best practices while engaging with the start-ups to better facilitate the outcomes of CEWS. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is no systematic literature review available in the domain of CEWS – thus, this study makes an important methodological contribution to the field. By consolidating the fragmented yet growing knowledge on CEWS, the study presents a detailed understanding of what drives and obstructs the engagement between large corporations and start-ups.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Findings From Review Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Findings From Review Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Corporate engagement with start-ups (CEWS): a systematic review of literature and future research agenda

Jha,

Singh,

Basu

2024

EBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The concentration of creative industries is directly influenced by the entrepreneurial performance of creative organizations [49]. The scientific novelty and practical significance of this study is emphasized by the application of data not only on the number of established creative organizations (CrCIEnt) reporting on the revenue generated, but also on the number of established individual enterprises.…”

Section: Independent Variablesmentioning

confidence: 98%

Econometric Modeling of Creative Industries Concentration Process in the Siberian and the Urals Single-Industry Towns

Antonova,

Pchelintsev

2023

Mathematics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Creative industry is considered the driver of modern urban development. It raises the new wave of issues of re-industrialization policy in single-industry towns. Nevertheless, the algorithms of current mathematical modeling in regional economies are not complex enough, leaving out spatial errors and variety in models used. We present eight steps of econometric analysis, considering local-level data. For the research, a balanced data panel was formed for 38 single-industry towns in Siberia and the Urals in Russia, for the period of 2013–2017. For mathematical modeling of the process of concentration of creative industries in single-industry towns, first, we present the specific indices of concentration, variety, and spatial disparities. Then, we test the full list of possible models for the variables. Then, we evaluate the regional offset. We describe the sufficient F-test, Hausman test and Breusch–Pagan Lagrange multiplier tests, choosing the most appropriate model. Finally, we evaluate the spatial autorepression of residuals. This algorithm allows us prove the data period and identify the tendency of spatial heterogeneity growth. We assume it to be the growing spillover effect in creative industries. At the same time, despite the positive trend of decreasing concentration of creative industries in single-industry towns, mono-industry continues to have a meaningful impact on their development, which forms the basis of path dependence. In this regard, the main actor of development in towns is city-forming enterprise, through the tools of corporate social responsibility. In view of the latter, it is proposed to develop tools for corporate creative responsibility in single-industry organizations within cities and regions. Finally, the general concern about the growth of spatial differentiation at the level of cities and regions is not yet significant.

show abstract

“…Por consiguiente, ante el amplio flujo de información derivado de muchas interacciones, es necesario percibir con prontitud los cambios existentes, de cara a dar una respuesta atingente y articulada entre los miembros de un equipo. Bajo esa perspectiva, la implementación de estrategias exige la interdependencia, es decir, la cooperación entre distintos involucrados, considerando las características del entorno en un determinado momento (Anokhin et al, 2021;Graham & Hede, 2016). De tal forma, la acción conlleva una planificación más dinámica donde se toman en cuenta opiniones diversas en función de factores ambientales en un tiempo específico.…”

Section: Marco Conceptualunclassified

La Gestión De La Complejidad en El Ecosistema Emprendedor

Lozano Segura,

Castillo Artiga,

Alfaro Sifontes

2024

Actas IDI-UNICyT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Actualmente, la necesidad por una aproximación más compleja de la realidad se evidencia en el conocimiento sobre el entorno emprendedor donde se asume la existencia de interdependencias entre actores y factores contextuales, requiriendo una postura relativista, al considerar que cada entorno debe ser valorado como un sistema complejo con características propias. Ante esta situación, la Universidad Doctor José Matías Delgado se propuso el reto de crear un proceso metodológico que permita la atención individual y personalizada para el emprendimiento. Para ello, se llevó a cabo un diseño de investigación cualitativa de tipo narrativo, basado en el estudio de casos de atención a emprendedores del Centro de Emprendimiento de la Universidad, durante el período 2014-2022. Particularmente, la metodología creada mantiene un enfoque sistémico y abarca cuatro etapas: sensibilización, identificación, gestación de la empresa e impulso económico. Cada una de ellas está delimitada por un hito de avance en el desarrollo del proyectoo emprendimiento, en un contexto específico. Su característica clave es la flexibilidad y adaptabilidad, al ofrecer libertad para ajustarse a diferentes casos atendidos. Para ello, se integran “módulos adaptativos” que permiten el ajuste metodológico, dándole un carácter sistémico al atender al sujeto, a través de un acomodo constante ante sus necesidades y características. En ese sentido, el abordaje sistémico permite que la atención se centre en las interacciones entre sujeto y contexto, previniendo la generalización. De tal forma, el enfoque metodológico es más cualitativo, resolviendo la necesidad de un tratamiento multinivel y multifactorial para el emprendimiento.

show abstract

Flagship enterprises, entrepreneurial clusters, and business entry rates: insights from the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship

Cited by 11 publications

References 83 publications

Corporate engagement with start-ups (CEWS): a systematic review of literature and future research agenda

Corporate engagement with start-ups (CEWS): a systematic review of literature and future research agenda

Econometric Modeling of Creative Industries Concentration Process in the Siberian and the Urals Single-Industry Towns

La Gestión De La Complejidad en El Ecosistema Emprendedor

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About