2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-015-5213-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flame-retardant effect of montmorillonite intercalation iron compounds in polypropylene/aluminum hydroxide composites system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pk-HRR of the pure PP is 1057 kW/m 2 , and the pk-HRR values of PP-5%LDH, PP-10%LDH and PP-20%LDH were obviously decreased to 878, 705, and 500 kW/m 2 , respectively. Liu et al reported that when 50 mass% ATH is added to the PP matrix, the pk-HRR of PP/ATH composite is 539.8 kW/m 2 [52]. Compared with the reported PP/ATH with 50 mass% ATH, the PP-20%LDH shows better flame retardancy.…”
Section: Combustion Behavior Of Compositesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The pk-HRR of the pure PP is 1057 kW/m 2 , and the pk-HRR values of PP-5%LDH, PP-10%LDH and PP-20%LDH were obviously decreased to 878, 705, and 500 kW/m 2 , respectively. Liu et al reported that when 50 mass% ATH is added to the PP matrix, the pk-HRR of PP/ATH composite is 539.8 kW/m 2 [52]. Compared with the reported PP/ATH with 50 mass% ATH, the PP-20%LDH shows better flame retardancy.…”
Section: Combustion Behavior Of Compositesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The diversity and abundance of data were reasons why such different scales were provided for detection of behavior of PP against flame. Here: ■ ATH-50 [ 80 ], ATH-60 [ 81 ], ATH-20, ATH-40, MDH-20, MDH-40 [ 82 ], MDH-40, MDH-60 [ 82 ], MDH-62.5 [ 83 ], MDH-50 [ 84 ], MDH-40 [ 85 ], MDH-30, m-MDH-30, m-MDH-30 [ 86 ], MDH-10, MDH-15 [ 87 ], Kaol-25 [ 64 ], Kaol-0.5, Kaol-1.5, Kaol-3, m-Kaol-0.5, m-Kaol-1.5, m-Kaol-3 [ 88 ], Kaol-1.5, m-Kaol-1.5 [ 89 ], Kaol-10, Kaol-20, Kaol-30, m-Kaol-10, m-Kaol-20, m-Kaol-30, TC-10, TC-20, TC-30 [ 90 ], LDH-0.5, LDH-1, LDH-1.5, m-LDH-0.5, m-LDH-1, m-LDH-1.5, LDH-0.5, LDH-1, LDH-1.5, m-LDH-0.5, m-LDH-1, m-LDH-1.5 [ 91 ], A-LDH-1, A-LDH-2, B-LDH-1, B-LDH-2, B-LDH-4, C-LDH-1, C-LDH-2, C-LDH-4, D-LDH-1, D-LDH-2, D-LDH-4, E-LDH-1, E-LDH-2, E-LDH-4 [ 92 ], A-LDH-1, A-LDH-4, B-LDH-1, B-LDH-4, C-LDH-1, C-LDH-4, D-LDH-1, D-LDH-4, E-LDH-1, E-LDH-4 [ 92 ], A-LDH-1, A-LDH-4, B-LDH-1, B-LDH-4, C-LDH-1, C-LDH-4, D-LDH-1, D-LDH-4, E-LDH-1, E-LDH-4 [ 92 ], A-LDH-1, A-LDH-4, C-LDH-1, C-LDH-4, E-LDH-1, E-LDH-4 [ 92 ], m-LDH-1, m-LDH-3, m-LDH-5 [ 93 ], m-LDH-3, m-LDH-5, m-LDH-10 [ 94 ], LDH-10.7, m-LDH-10.7 [ 95 ], alkyl-NH 4 Cl-1.2, MMT-5, H-MMT-5, m-MMT-5 [ 96 ], m-MMT-5 [ 96 ], m-MMT-4.75, m-MMT-4.75, m-MMT-4.75 [ 97 ], ...…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A combination of several fillers can give a synergistic effect and enhance the power of the fillers. Otherwise, more than 30% would have been required to achieve a similar effect if the fillers were used alone, as different studies showed that more than 30% of fillers were required to have any significant effect on flame-retarding properties [43,44]. On the other hand, char-forming ability could also significantly improve the flame-retardant property of a material, as shown by Sain et al [13].…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main designated flame-retardant filler used in this study was aluminium trihydrate (ATH), which can be classified as a medium-strength filler. Studies have shown that quite a high percentage of aluminium trihydrate is required (equal to or above 30%) to have a better impact on the flame-retardant properties of a composite [43][44][45][46]. The thermal stability of aluminium trihydrate is also on the lower side as the 1 st step of decomposition takes place at around 200°C when the water molecules are released [47].…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%