1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0379-7112(96)00070-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flame spread on aviation fuels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it deviated significantly from the experimental measurements for multiple organic-water solutions [16]. Overall, application of the former models [3,10,11,15] is limited to solutions that can be assumed as ideal within the composition range considered. The new models taking into account non-ideality of the solution through liquid phase activity coefficients have to be used to predict efficiently the flash point of these miscible mixtures [4,5,9,12,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it deviated significantly from the experimental measurements for multiple organic-water solutions [16]. Overall, application of the former models [3,10,11,15] is limited to solutions that can be assumed as ideal within the composition range considered. The new models taking into account non-ideality of the solution through liquid phase activity coefficients have to be used to predict efficiently the flash point of these miscible mixtures [4,5,9,12,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Previously, Affens and McLaren [10] (1972) have developed a predictive model to determine the flash points of binary hydrocarbon mixtures based on Raoult's law. White et al, [11] (1997) have reduced this model to a simpler equation by ignoring any dependence of the lower flammable limit on temperature. A model for predicting the flash point of multi-component mixtures of only flammable compounds was also proposed [12] and verified using experimental data for ternary solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is not sufficient data to determine whether the difference in the average spill depth is meaningful with respect to fire growth. However, the depth is small compared to minimum required depths for flame spread reported in the literature (1.5 mm) [14]. The fact that the fires of Tests 10 and 11 did not burn to completion indicates that localized spill depth and surface features influence the growth of the fire.…”
Section: Fixed Quantity Fuel Spill Fire Testmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The 10 MW fire was modeled as a linear ramp from 0.1 MW to 10 MW over the first 52 seconds and then constant at 10 MW. The growth period of 52 seconds was calculated based on a flame spread rate of 0.1 m/s [ 14] and a burning rate of 0.011 kg/m 2 s (Figure 33) which corresponds to a heat release rate per unit area of 475 kW/m 2 . Tables 23 and 24 provide times to critical temperatures for varying exposure fires and distance from the fire.…”
Section: Hazard Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…은 라울의 법칙을 이용하여 가솔린과 디젤 등의 액체 혼합물의 인화점을 계산하는 방법을 제안하였 으며, White 등 (6) 은 Affens 모델의 복잡성을 단순화시킨 계산 방법을 제시하였다. Hanley (7) 는 순수 물질의 연소열과 혼합물의 Low Flammability Limit (LFL)에 의해 액체 혼합물의 인화점 을 계산하는 방법을 제시하였다.…”
Section: 산업체와 대학연구소에서 취급하는 가연성 액체의 종류 는 매우 많다 이들의 인화점을 모두 측정하는 것은 너무unclassified