43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 2005
DOI: 10.2514/6.2005-931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flame stabilization using a plasma discharge in a lifted jet flame

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned earlier, the flow actuation mechanism can be described by the action of two consecutive processes: ion generation by electron collisions, and directional flow formation by the electric field. Although the USRD is believed to be a more efficient source of ions in comparison to the AC DBD [15][16][17][18][19] , its short electric field duration (~ 30 ns) diminishes its flow control ability. We surmise that the ions generated during the discharge pulse are not effectively accelerated between the electrode gap (and hence do not transfer their momentum to the boundary layer fluid) due to the lack of persistence in the electric field.…”
Section: A Comparison Of Usrd and Ac Dbdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned earlier, the flow actuation mechanism can be described by the action of two consecutive processes: ion generation by electron collisions, and directional flow formation by the electric field. Although the USRD is believed to be a more efficient source of ions in comparison to the AC DBD [15][16][17][18][19] , its short electric field duration (~ 30 ns) diminishes its flow control ability. We surmise that the ions generated during the discharge pulse are not effectively accelerated between the electrode gap (and hence do not transfer their momentum to the boundary layer fluid) due to the lack of persistence in the electric field.…”
Section: A Comparison Of Usrd and Ac Dbdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we test and compare the flow control capabilities of conventional alternating current (AC) DBDs and ultra short repetitively pulsed plasma discharges (USRD). The comparison was motivated by evidence that a USRD generates a more highly nonequilibrium discharge when compared to the AC DBD [15][16][17][18][19] . Based on further comparisons carried out here, we have performed more detailed parametric studies of varying velocity, surface roughness, Reynolds number and electrode configuration using AC DBDs, which have proven to be more effective in this particular application.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanosecond repetitively pulsed gas discharges have been demonstrated recently for flame stabilization at low [5] and high [6]- [8] frequencies. However, the effectiveness of repetitively pulsed plasmas has not yet been investigated for the ignition of combustible mixtures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that the physical characteristics of X-shaped flames are system-dependent and depend on more than just the combustion chemistry. Although many studies have been done on coaxial diffusion burners [13][14][15], there have been no studies of X-shaped flames. Therefore, the characteristics of X-shaped flames formed with a coaxial, premixed burner were studied and compared to those of NSF and polyhedral flames.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%