2014
DOI: 10.1071/wf13045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flammability of litter sampled according to two different methods: comparison of results in laboratory experiments

Abstract: In the laboratory, different types of litter samples (constructed v. intact) can be used in flammability experiments but the sampling method of these litters could affect litter flammability results. To assess this effect, samples of litters were collected in South-eastern France, according to two different methods previously used in other studies, one keeping intact the structure of the litter layers (non-constructed litter) and the other requiring the construction of the litter, using mainly the surface litt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our study highlights trade‐offs among flammability attributes within grass and litter fuels, it is important to acknowledge that landscape flammability is far more complex than can be captured by a standardized sample of a single fuel type (Gill & Zylstra, ; de Magalhães & Schwilk, ; Varner et al ., ). There is a strong influence of packing and fuel arrangement on landscape flammability (de Magalhães & Schwilk, ; Ganteaume et al ., ). While it is difficult to envisage a particular fuel that is highly ignitable, combustible and sustainable, this might be possible for a landscape with a mix of fine and coarse fuels, suitably arranged to facilitate a ‘combustion cascade’, whereby the grass fuels are ignitable, litter fuels are combustible and coarse fuels sustain combustion over a long duration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although our study highlights trade‐offs among flammability attributes within grass and litter fuels, it is important to acknowledge that landscape flammability is far more complex than can be captured by a standardized sample of a single fuel type (Gill & Zylstra, ; de Magalhães & Schwilk, ; Varner et al ., ). There is a strong influence of packing and fuel arrangement on landscape flammability (de Magalhães & Schwilk, ; Ganteaume et al ., ). While it is difficult to envisage a particular fuel that is highly ignitable, combustible and sustainable, this might be possible for a landscape with a mix of fine and coarse fuels, suitably arranged to facilitate a ‘combustion cascade’, whereby the grass fuels are ignitable, litter fuels are combustible and coarse fuels sustain combustion over a long duration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…; Ganteaume et al . ). Furthermore, a recent investigation of tropical rainforest‐savanna boundaries attributed the greater flammability of the savanna biome to the presence of low bulk density grass fuel, with lesser contributions from microclimatic variables (Hoffmann et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…After the old leaves are shed, the probability of active crowning could decline (if the drop in canopy bulk density is high enough) and surface fires may become more likely and, potentially, more intense due to higher fuel load (note that the flammability of the surface fuel bed will also be affected by leaf traits that influence the packing and aeration of the fuel bed [Ganteaume et al. , Cornwell et al. ], but a full review of leaf traits and surface fuel is beyond the scope of this article).…”
Section: Fire Resistance At Individual Tree Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this effect is only transient and lasts for a few weeks, until leaf dropping. After the old leaves are shed, the probability of active crowning could decline (if the drop in canopy bulk density is high enough) and surface fires may become more likely and, potentially, more intense due to higher fuel load (note that the flammability of the surface fuel bed will also be affected by leaf traits that influence the packing and aeration of the fuel bed [Ganteaume et al 2014, but a full review of leaf traits and surface fuel is beyond the scope of this article). Such leaf senescence (that later leads to shedding in evergreens or drought deciduousness in deciduous species) may be adaptive for FIG.…”
Section: Structural Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%