2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flank facilitation and contour integration: Different sites

Abstract: Observers' ability to integrate features into extended contours, and to exploit the flanking structure to facilitate contrast detection (flank facilitation), exhibit a similar dependence on element spacing and orientation. Here, we investigate whether this reflects the operation of a common cortical mechanism by comparing performance for both tasks under monocular, binocular, dichoptic, and stereoscopic viewing conditions. Our results clearly implicate different cortical sites for flank-facilitated detection a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
46
2
Order By: Relevance
“…If this is so, collinear facilitation may be limited to a subpopulation of cells that receive geniculate input in layer 4c beta of the striate cortex. Recent psychophysics also supports a very early, monocular cortical origin (Huang, Hess, & Dakin, 2006).…”
Section: The Processing Of Achromatic and Chromatic Spatial Informationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…If this is so, collinear facilitation may be limited to a subpopulation of cells that receive geniculate input in layer 4c beta of the striate cortex. Recent psychophysics also supports a very early, monocular cortical origin (Huang, Hess, & Dakin, 2006).…”
Section: The Processing Of Achromatic and Chromatic Spatial Informationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Much has now been learned about facilitation by flankers, including evidence that it involves amplifying modulation (Chen and Tyler, 2008;Huang, Hess and Dakin, 2006;Maehara, Huang and Hess, 2010), can be cancelled by non-collinear flanks (Solomon and Morgan, 2000); depends upon input from other parts of the adjacent surround (Mareschal and Clifford, 2013), and is itself modulated by attention (Ramalingam et al, 2013). Psychophysical studies show that detection is improved when the flankers precede the target, or are presented simultaneously with it, but not when the target precedes the flankers (Polat and Sagi, 2006).…”
Section: Contextual Disambiguation In Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rigorous psychophysical comparisons between contour integration and flanker facilitation, a paradigmatic case of amplification, shows that they have similar but distinct mechanisms (Huang, Hess, and Dakin, 2006). Most of the evidence concerning those mechanisms comes from studies of non-human animals, however.…”
Section: Gestalt Groupingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the processes fundamental to spatial integration of disparate contour elements likely occur in V1 (Polat, 2013), recent research suggests that the likely cortical site of larger-scale contour representation is V2 (Huang et al, 2006) indicating that these integrative processes might scale with receptive field size. The proximity and collinearity effects found in flanker facilitation tasks extend to larger-scale contour integration (Polat, 1999; Polat and Bonneh, 2000; Cass and Spehar, 2005; Zhaoping, 2011), such that elements are grouped into contours if they share orientation information and are sufficiently close together (see Geisler et al, 2001).…”
Section: Path To Object Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%