2003
DOI: 10.1086/374773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flaring X-Ray Emission from HST-1, a Knot in the M87 Jet

Abstract: We present Chandra X-ray monitoring of the M87 jet in 2002, which shows that the intensity of HST-1, an optical knot 0Љ .8 from the core, increased by a factor of 2 in 116 days and a factor of 4 in 2 yr. There was also a significant flux decrease over 2 months, with suggestive evidence for a softening of the spectrum. From this variability behavior, we argue that the bulk of the X-ray emission of HST-1 comes from synchrotron emission. None of the other conceivable emission processes can match the range of obse… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
120
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
9
120
3
Order By: Relevance
“…X-ray data have been taken with the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS) on board the Chandra satellite. For details of the Chandra data reduction procedures, see Harris et al (2003), Perlman et al (2003), and Harris et al (2009). In brief, a 1/8th segment of the back illuminated S3 chip of the ACIS detector aboard Chandra is used.…”
Section: X-raymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…X-ray data have been taken with the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS) on board the Chandra satellite. For details of the Chandra data reduction procedures, see Harris et al (2003), Perlman et al (2003), and Harris et al (2009). In brief, a 1/8th segment of the back illuminated S3 chip of the ACIS detector aboard Chandra is used.…”
Section: X-raymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach uses the event 1 file with no grade filtering (so as to recover all events affected by "grade migration") and energies from 0.2 to 17 keV are integrated so as to recover all the energy of the piled events. Other uncertainties for piled events come from the on-board filtering, the "eat-thy-neighbor" effect, and second-order effects such as release of trapped charge (see Appendix A of Harris Harris et al (2003), the basic analysis for this paper adopts the rectangular regions used in Harris et al (2006) so as to encompass more of the point-spread function. All events within each rectangle are weighted by their energy and the sum of these energies, when divided by the exposure times, gives the final keV s −1 value used in the light curve.…”
Section: X-raymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ObsID 011119010 of NGC 4636 and 13814 of NGC 5195 met these criteria, but a visual inspection showed low number counts in the hard band and were rejected from the sample. Finally, NGC 4486 was rejected because it is well known that this source is dominated by the jet emission (Harris et al 2003(Harris et al , 2006(Harris et al , 2009(Harris et al , 2011.…”
Section: Sample and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since most photons are of order 1 keV, the magnitudes of these two observational parameters are quite similar. Further details of our processing methods can be found in Papers I, III, and V of our series (Harris et al 2003(Harris et al , 2006(Harris et al , 2009.…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%