2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flawed analyses undermine proposed relationship between childhood cat ownership and schizophrenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cat ownership or contact during pregnancy (Kapperud et al 1996; Cook et al 2000) and childhood (Taylor et al 1997) do not appear to be associated with T. Gondii infection, although handling soiled cat litter is known to be associated with infection (Kapperud et al 1996). Epidemiological studies which have reported an association between cat ownership and psychosis - (Torrey & Yolken 1995; Torrey et al 2000, 2015; Yuksel et al 2010), have generally been hindered by notable methodological limitations (Wolf & Hamilton 2015), including reliance on case-control designs that are susceptible to recall bias, small ad hoc samples and weak statistical analyses, which have failed to adequately account for confounding or missing data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cat ownership or contact during pregnancy (Kapperud et al 1996; Cook et al 2000) and childhood (Taylor et al 1997) do not appear to be associated with T. Gondii infection, although handling soiled cat litter is known to be associated with infection (Kapperud et al 1996). Epidemiological studies which have reported an association between cat ownership and psychosis - (Torrey & Yolken 1995; Torrey et al 2000, 2015; Yuksel et al 2010), have generally been hindered by notable methodological limitations (Wolf & Hamilton 2015), including reliance on case-control designs that are susceptible to recall bias, small ad hoc samples and weak statistical analyses, which have failed to adequately account for confounding or missing data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%