2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.05.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexibility identification and deflection prediction of a three-span concrete box girder bridge using impacting test data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…VITs are then conducted using OSP locations to extract modal information for FE model updating. A review of the scientific literature related to the dynamic characterization of bridges under different excitation techniques allows the identification of the most influential parameters [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ], which are bridge typology, main span length (L), excitation source, sensor-to-sensor separation distance, time-series length, and sampling frequency. Figure 5 shows the distribution of the variables as a function of the main span length L. It is possible to observe that the excitation sources most widely used are ambient and vehicles, the sensor separation distance mainly ranges from L/4 to L/9, the sampling frequency ranges from 100 and 256 Hz, and the time-series length ranges from 1.5 and 15 min.…”
Section: Preliminary Analysis For Influential Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VITs are then conducted using OSP locations to extract modal information for FE model updating. A review of the scientific literature related to the dynamic characterization of bridges under different excitation techniques allows the identification of the most influential parameters [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ], which are bridge typology, main span length (L), excitation source, sensor-to-sensor separation distance, time-series length, and sampling frequency. Figure 5 shows the distribution of the variables as a function of the main span length L. It is possible to observe that the excitation sources most widely used are ambient and vehicles, the sensor separation distance mainly ranges from L/4 to L/9, the sampling frequency ranges from 100 and 256 Hz, and the time-series length ranges from 1.5 and 15 min.…”
Section: Preliminary Analysis For Influential Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los sensores de fibra óptica también han sido muy empleados para estudiar deformaciones [25], [26], [27], [28], [29] y flechas [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], objeto de este artículo.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…A sledgehammer is a well‐known excitation device, generating high‐frequency band impacting forces; however, its main drawback is that the magnitudes of impacting forces are relatively low (below 20 kN), which cannot be employed in order to fully excite the interested frequency band of a bridge (Tian et al., ). In order to tackle this limitation, a vehicle‐mounted excitation device with drop weight was developed, which can induce impact forces with large magnitudes (around 100 kN) and high‐frequency band (0–200 Hz) (Catbas et al., ; Zhang et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many algorithms were developed for structural modal properties identification, such as modal responses‐based method (Oh et al., ), modal identification using orthogonality of filtered response vectors (Kim et al., ), discretized synchro‐squeezed wavelet and Hilbert transforms (Li et al., ), MUltiple SIgnal Classification (MUSIC) (Amezquita‐Sanchez and Adeli, ; Amezquita‐Sanchez et al., ), entropy‐based model identification method (Yin et al., ), and dynamic wavelet neural network (Jiang and Adeli, ). Besides, several algorithms were developed for processing the impact‐testing data, such as complex mode indicator function (CMIF), PolyMAX, subspace identification (SI) (Zhang et al., ; Tian et al., ; Sun et al., ; Karami and Akbarabadi, ; Li et al., ), among others. Both CMIF and PolyMAX methods belong to frequency domain parameter identification, and they can be used for a single impact force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%