2005
DOI: 10.2495/978-1-85312-941-4/08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexible-wing-based micro air vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also revealed that the platform is capable of other styles of flight: flight using the propellers as the sole propulsion mode after reaching a critical velocity (either by a launch or by use of both modes initially), intermittent flapping, and gliding. The propeller only and gliding is possible because the wings passively balloon into a suitable airfoil shape in flight (using flexible wings with propeller propulsion has been studied in other works 38,40 ). Notably, gliding via the use of gravity to generate velocity is viable.…”
Section: Mixed Mode Flight Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They also revealed that the platform is capable of other styles of flight: flight using the propellers as the sole propulsion mode after reaching a critical velocity (either by a launch or by use of both modes initially), intermittent flapping, and gliding. The propeller only and gliding is possible because the wings passively balloon into a suitable airfoil shape in flight (using flexible wings with propeller propulsion has been studied in other works 38,40 ). Notably, gliding via the use of gravity to generate velocity is viable.…”
Section: Mixed Mode Flight Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,30,[32][33][34][35][36][37] One such approach is the usage of flexible membranes which provides performance with passive deformation (with benefits not limited to flapping flight only). 35,[38][39][40] Additionally, it was noted that usage of a single actuator to drive both wings saves weight, but limits the flapping gait. This is because only fixed amplitudes can be achieved and wing gait characteristics are tied to a single source, 41 unless a complex mechanism is designed to overcome it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= aspect ratio b = wing span, cm c = chord, cm C L = lift coefficient C L max = maximum lift coefficient (at stall) C SF = side force coefficient C l = roll moment coefficient C l;β = roll-stability derivative, rad −1 C n = yaw moment coefficient C n;β = yaw stiffness derivative, rad −1 f s = data-sampling frequency, Hz Re = Reynolds number U 0 = freestream velocity, m∕s I N RECENT years, the capabilities of micro aerial vehicles (MAVs) have improved so dramatically that several different institutions have designed and flown a wide variety of vehicles for a multitude of applications [1][2][3][4][5]. These designs typically rely heavily on iterative testing procedures because no readily accessible analytic tools are available for MAV development.…”
Section: Armentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that, one of the least understood aspect of small-scale flight is its aerodynamic performance, which is the focus of the current study.From an aerodynamics perspective, a key challenge for a MAV designer is the low lift-to-drag ratio of even the most optimized airfoil geometries at low Reynolds numbers. Several fixed-wing MAVs have already been successfully tested [2][3][4][5][6]. One particular example [5,6] has a weight of 80 grams and a flight endurance of about 30 minutes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%