2004
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2004)130:5(616)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexible Work Breakdown Structure for Integrated Cost and Schedule Control

Abstract: Integration of cost and schedule control systems has been an issue of great concern for researchers and practitioners in the construction industry. Nevertheless, the real-world implementation of this promising concept has not been popular enough to maximize the benefits that this integration has to offer. One of the major barriers is the overhead effort to collect and maintain detailed data. The purpose of this paper is to propose a flexible work breakdown structure (WBS) that optimizes the overhead effort by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…WBSs usually take as their starting points the activities to be conducted, but they may also use the deliverables/products of the project as their points of departure. Jung and Woo (2004) refer to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), which defines eight classification classes (facets) of construction information: facilities (e.g., factory, hospital), spaces (e.g., recreations spaces, office spaces), elements (e.g., foundations, exterior walls), work sections (e.g., excavation, cast-in-place concrete), construction products (e.g., steel bars, paint), construction aids (e.g., scaffolding, tools), management (e.g., contracts, cost control) and attributes (e.g., size, weight). Risk breakdown structures can be divided into the management risk area (risks that can be controlled by the organization), the external risk area (risks that originate from factors beyond the control of the organization) and the technology risk area (risks that are inherent in the technology and processes used).…”
Section: Project Success Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WBSs usually take as their starting points the activities to be conducted, but they may also use the deliverables/products of the project as their points of departure. Jung and Woo (2004) refer to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), which defines eight classification classes (facets) of construction information: facilities (e.g., factory, hospital), spaces (e.g., recreations spaces, office spaces), elements (e.g., foundations, exterior walls), work sections (e.g., excavation, cast-in-place concrete), construction products (e.g., steel bars, paint), construction aids (e.g., scaffolding, tools), management (e.g., contracts, cost control) and attributes (e.g., size, weight). Risk breakdown structures can be divided into the management risk area (risks that can be controlled by the organization), the external risk area (risks that originate from factors beyond the control of the organization) and the technology risk area (risks that are inherent in the technology and processes used).…”
Section: Project Success Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is usually not an effective approach. According to Jung and Woo (2004), cost and scheduling are closely interrelated, because they share a lot of common data in their controlling processes hence, integrating cost and schedule control functions provides an effective tool for monitoring the construction process. In the words of one of the interviewees (a director at a contracting organization):…”
Section: Analyzementioning
confidence: 99%
“…at is, while BIM is being effectively used for analyses that use 3D models, it is not being used for construction information management through the consolidation of construction information and database building. is may be attributed to the insufficiency of database systems for BIM information management and the lack of means to effectively link figure information and nonfigure information [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%