2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexural analysis and design of stainless steel reinforced concrete beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, other works reported that the formulas of codes GB 50010 and ACI 318 were conservative in predicting the flexural capacity of the stainless steel-reinforced concrete beams [34,[64][65][66]. However, it is not necessarily safe to apply the Eurocode 2 material model directly to the stainless steel-reinforced concrete members, and the proper consideration of the strain hardening characteristics of stainless steel bars in the design process is conducive to improving the flexural capacity and ductility of concrete beams [67,68]. In addition, Zhang et al [64] found that the deflection of stainless steel-reinforced concrete beams calculated by the formula of code American ACI 318 was better than that predicted by the formula of code Chinese GB 50010.…”
Section: Mechanical Behavior Of Stainless Steel-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, other works reported that the formulas of codes GB 50010 and ACI 318 were conservative in predicting the flexural capacity of the stainless steel-reinforced concrete beams [34,[64][65][66]. However, it is not necessarily safe to apply the Eurocode 2 material model directly to the stainless steel-reinforced concrete members, and the proper consideration of the strain hardening characteristics of stainless steel bars in the design process is conducive to improving the flexural capacity and ductility of concrete beams [67,68]. In addition, Zhang et al [64] found that the deflection of stainless steel-reinforced concrete beams calculated by the formula of code American ACI 318 was better than that predicted by the formula of code Chinese GB 50010.…”
Section: Mechanical Behavior Of Stainless Steel-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instrumental measurements allow to observe the vertical and horizontal deformations of superstructures and supports. Those measurements allow to timely the detect hidden defects that cannot be discovered during the inspection, help explain the appearance of defects found during the inspection, as well as choose the most correct ways to repair and strengthen the structure [9][10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there was an error between the results with or without the bond-slip and the experimental values due to the difference between the RPC constitutive relationship curve and the actual value. The dilatancy angle, eccentricity, the ratio of initial equibiaxial compressive yield stress to initial uniaxial compressive yield stress, the ratio of the second stress invariant on the tensile meridian, and viscosity coefficient were set as 30°, 0.1, 1.16, 0.6667 and 0.0005, respectively [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. Thus, the bond-slip constitutive relationship between the section steel and RPC was not accurate.…”
Section: Experimental Simulation Of Steel-reinforced Reactive Powder Concrete Beams Under Bendingmentioning
confidence: 99%