Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement for Concrete Structures 2003
DOI: 10.1142/9789812704863_0124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexural Behaviour of Bridge Deck Slabs Reinforced With FRP Composite Bars

Abstract: The serviceability concerns, specially cracking and deflections usually govern the design of reinforced concrete deck slabs. This research program is designed to investigate the flexural behaviour of concrete one-way (deck) slabs reinforced with different types of FRP composite bars. A total of 7 full size slabs were constructed and tested. The slabs were 3100-mm long xlOOOmm wide x 200-mm deep. The test parameters are the type of FRP reinforcing bars as well as the reinforcement ratio. Three slabs were reinfo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deflections at the service load level ( P ser = 110.25 kN) for the tested deck slabs ranged from 1.20 to 2.28 mm, which were below the allowable limits (1/400 of the span) . The control slab (SF) exhibited the largest deflection at the service load level, but it should be noted that due to continuity of the slab over the girders in the actual bridge deck, the deflections at the same load level are expected to be less than what was measured in the laboratory . The FRP‐reduction factor and the partial prestressing index have no effect on the deflection at the service load level.…”
Section: Tests Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The deflections at the service load level ( P ser = 110.25 kN) for the tested deck slabs ranged from 1.20 to 2.28 mm, which were below the allowable limits (1/400 of the span) . The control slab (SF) exhibited the largest deflection at the service load level, but it should be noted that due to continuity of the slab over the girders in the actual bridge deck, the deflections at the same load level are expected to be less than what was measured in the laboratory . The FRP‐reduction factor and the partial prestressing index have no effect on the deflection at the service load level.…”
Section: Tests Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 The control slab (SF) exhibited the largest deflection at the service load level, but it should be noted that due to continuity of the slab over the girders in the actual bridge deck, the deflections at the same load level are expected to be less than what was measured in the laboratory. 2 The FRP-reduction factor and the partial prestressing index have no effect on the deflection at the service load level. In fact, these slabs exhibited cracking loads higher than the service load level; therefore, the deflections of these slabs were controlled by the gross inertia of the concrete cross section.…”
Section: Deflectionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, due to the relatively low modulus of FRPs, FRP-reinforced concrete structures would exhibit greater deflections than their steel-reinforced counterparts, and this reduces the serviceability of the flexural members. Accordingly serviceability requirements govern the design for FRPreinforced concrete members in most cases [3][4][5], especially for intermediate and long spanning sections reinforced with FRP bars. In addition, the linear stress-strain relationship of FRPs up to rupture without a discernible yield point leads to a non-plastic ultimate state for concrete members reinforced with FRPs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%