2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.01.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexural behaviour of composite steel–concrete beams utilising blind bolt shear connectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides behaviour of blind bolts in solid slabs under static loading tested in push-out and beam tests, the investigation on blind bolts also covered dynamic behaviour [18,19], timedependent behaviour [20] and behaviour under combined shear and tension [48]. Implementation of blind bolts was suggested in both demountable composite beams [25,26] and in bridge rehabilitation work [21,26], the only difference being in the mounting process: in the latter case, holes were cored in a concrete slab and drilled in a steel flange from the top side of the specimen, then bolts were fixed and holes in the concrete slab were filled with grout. Nevertheless, a different mounting process did not significantly affect bolt behaviour.…”
Section: Figure 9 Comparison Of Shear Connector Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides behaviour of blind bolts in solid slabs under static loading tested in push-out and beam tests, the investigation on blind bolts also covered dynamic behaviour [18,19], timedependent behaviour [20] and behaviour under combined shear and tension [48]. Implementation of blind bolts was suggested in both demountable composite beams [25,26] and in bridge rehabilitation work [21,26], the only difference being in the mounting process: in the latter case, holes were cored in a concrete slab and drilled in a steel flange from the top side of the specimen, then bolts were fixed and holes in the concrete slab were filled with grout. Nevertheless, a different mounting process did not significantly affect bolt behaviour.…”
Section: Figure 9 Comparison Of Shear Connector Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the contact region between the concrete slab and the steel box girder top flanges, tangential contact of the “Hard contact—Penalty” type was considered. The coefficient friction between steel and concrete materials, used to represents the tangential contact, was considered equal to 0.4 (Wijesiri Pathirana et al, 2016). Figure 8 shows the numerical model interactions.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the interaction between the headed shear studs and the concrete slab was also modeled by the “embedded constrain” command. This allows to efficiently simulate the action of the connector against shearing forces inside the concrete (Wijesiri Pathirana et al, 2016).…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Dallam [10] and Marshall et al [23] investigated the behavior of highstrength grip bolts as composite shear connectors, however, an attempt to demount the shear connectors was not undertaken in any of above mentioned researches. An application of blind bolts as shear connector in composite beams was investigated by Pathirana et al [36] and Mirza et al [24]. Full scale beam tests have shown that blind bolts exhibit comparable behavior to welded studs connectors in terms of stiffness, strength and ductility [36].…”
Section: Friction Grip Boltsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An application of blind bolts as shear connector in composite beams was investigated by Pathirana et al [36] and Mirza et al [24]. Full scale beam tests have shown that blind bolts exhibit comparable behavior to welded studs connectors in terms of stiffness, strength and ductility [36]. However, according to findings by Mirza et al [24] blind bolts exhibit relatively brittle behavior compared to welded connectors.…”
Section: Friction Grip Boltsmentioning
confidence: 99%